| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 14% | 2 of 117 | 7% | 29 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 11% → 14%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 25 of 130 | 12% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 23 of 105 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 15 of 80 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 30 of 111 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 25 of 130 |
| Mobile apps | 11% | 14% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 11% → 14%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 117 |
| Mobile & push | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 15 of 80 |
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 23 of 105 |
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“start by evaluating Braze ... or CleverTap (for a better price-to-feature ratio with strong analytics and retention capabilities)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Mobile apps · direct prompt · first choice
“route messages through the official WhatsApp Business Cloud API (e.g., Wati, Respond.io, CleverTap, Twilio, Bird, or AiSensy)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SMS & WhatsApp · negative prompt · first choice
“If you want to wake up dormant app users and keep them inside your app, choose CleverTap or OneSignal.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · first choice
“CleverTap is positioned as the leading mid-market mobile marketing platform on value and analytics.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mobile apps · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid ... CleverTap — Strong for mobile-first consumer apps ... less aligned with typical B2B SaaS use cases.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile apps · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Braze, Airship, or CleverTap” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proximity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise tools like Braze/CleverTap” Grok 4.1 Fast · Proximity · budget prompt · hard negative
“frequently flagged as risky for initial use” Mistral Small · In-app messaging · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 186 of the 189 answers that named CleverTap and are not a share of its labels.
476 of the 519 domain citations in answers naming CleverTap came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,377 | 11 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 156 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 109 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 106 | 5 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 75 | 2 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 73 | 13 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 67 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | ||
| Comparison | 40 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Podcast or video | 19 | 0 | 2025-05-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-02-28 |
As the event pages on clevertap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page clevertap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What CleverTap's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: clevertap.com, clevertap.com/pricing, trust.clevertap.com, clevertap.com/platform, clevertap.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CleverTap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CleverTap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CleverTap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
CleverTap is among the products AI models recommend first in Mobile apps this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.