Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 of 71, unchanged
3 categories · RankedPushwoosh
54Judge labels
5First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Mobile & push for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 80 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Pushwoosh →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 73
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 80
6%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 93
3%13 labels
accepted challenger
In mobile & push · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pushwoosh for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 6% | 4 of 80 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 47 of 117 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 54 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pushwoosh held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Mobile & push · by segment
Mid-market▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 21 → 4 of 76
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 13 of 83
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile & push | 0% | 6% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 4 of 80 |
| In-app messaging | 5% | 0% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 54 of 105 |
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 47 of 117 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pushwoosh across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pushwoosh across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels2
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Pushwoosh - a mid-market alternative to Braze and Airship for teams that need cross-platform push (web + mobile) with event-based automation at a fraction of the enterprise price.” Llama 4 Maverick · Mobile & push · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Sinch Engagement or Pushwoosh for a balance of cost, ease-of-use, and power.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“OneSignal and Pushwoosh are the best choices” Mistral Small · Mobile & push · direct prompt · first choice
“Pushwoosh if cost is a primary concern — at mid-market scale it's roughly 40–50% cheaper than OneSignal” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“console depth varies by plan tier, so capability may depend on what you pay for” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pushwoosh, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pushwoosh was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pushwoosh, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pushwoosh was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pushwoosh. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 54 answers that named Pushwoosh and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pushwoosh.comYour site32
guideflow.com31
courier.com26
onesignal.com23
viasocket.com20
engagelab.com17
attentive.com16
g2.com15
learn.g2.com15
mobile-text-alerts.com15
178 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming Pushwoosh came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pushwoosh.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pushwoosh takes 6% of first choices and OneSignal takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pushwoosh.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pushwoosh takes 6% of first choices and OneSignal takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “best mobile push notification and sms marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“pushwoosh”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,463 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,153 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,252
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 80 in mobile & push
Segment leader
45%
OneSignal
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 54 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 53 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pushwoosh.com
7,160
subdomains included
Content
2,071
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
714 · 145
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,857 | 82 | 2026-09-25 | Mobile apps, CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 79 | 4 | 2026-07-07 | Mobile apps | |
| Comparison | 66 | 11 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 0 | 2024-02-15 | ||
| Case study | 18 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 17 | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Native in app messages blog
- 2026-09-25Pushwoosh product update september 2026 vol 4 blog
- 2026-09-25Pushwoosh product update september 2026 vol 4 blog
- 2026-09-24Soc 2 type 2 blog
- 2026-09-24Soc 2 type 2 blog
- 2026-09-24Soc 2 type 2 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pushwoosh.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pushwoosh
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pushwoosh.ShowHide
The company
Pushwoosh.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- pushwoosh.com
- Headquarters
- Fairfax, United States
- Founded
- 2014
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Customer engagement platform for mobile and web apps. Push notifications, in-app messages, email, SMS, WhatsApp, and more.
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Introducing Push only: our new plan at $7 per 1,000 MAU pushwoosh.com
- Starting price
- $7 per 1,000 MAU pushwoosh.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free pushwoosh.com
- Integrations claimed
- 30 pushwoosh.com/integrations
- Certifications
- GDPRBundesdatenschutzgesetzISO 27 001ISO 27001:2022 certifiedSOC 2 Type 2 auditedHIPAA compliant
- Hosting
- EU (Germany)
- Customers named
- TelepizzaRydeGB NewsHungrynakiBladestormBantoaAvaTrade
What Pushwoosh's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pushwoosh.com, pushwoosh.com/pricing, pushwoosh.com/products/api, pushwoosh.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pushwoosh's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pushwoosh, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pushwoosh by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pushwoosh is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pushwoosh, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.