Five of fourteen models named OneSignal first on the direct prompt; zero named Twilio Programmable Messaging. OneSignal was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Twilio Programmable Messaging by eleven and OneSignal carries 62 labels and Twilio Programmable Messaging 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Q140701571, San Mateo, United States, founded 2011. Named in four categories this edition.
By Twilio, San Francisco, United States, founded 2008. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mobile marketing and push page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, OneSignal and Twilio Programmable Messaging were named in the same answer sixty-two times, of the 348 answers naming OneSignal and the 88 naming Twilio Programmable Messaging. In those answers Twilio Programmable Messaging took the first choice three times and OneSignal thirty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“OneSignal relies primarily on FCM for Android delivery, which creates reliability issues in markets like China where Google services are blocked.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Budget-friendly, easy setup, good for lean teams | Less enterprise depth for complex journeys” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with: OneSignal (verify new pricing works for you)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend OneSignal as the starting point—it's cost-effective, has strong deliverability, and handles both push and SMS well.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Be Cautious of Developer-First CPaaS Engines if You Lack Engineering Support... Avoid If: You are a marketer or small business owner with no coding experience.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Twilio (DIY API) has mixed rep for SMS—solid infrastructure but complaints on deliverability/support; deprecated Notify service in 2025.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not a scam, but pricing surprises — carrier surcharges, 10DLC fees, and number rental can add ~50%+ to your budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Twilio as the top choice for a combined push and SMS messaging tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need maximum flexibility, have dev resources, and anticipate very high volumes → Twilio is the more powerful (but more work) choice.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you want maximum flexibility and have engineering resources; it is positioned as customizable and API-driven.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.