OneSignal vs Omnisend
Five of fourteen models named OneSignal first on the direct prompt; zero named Omnisend. OneSignal was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Omnisend by eight and OneSignal carries 62 labels and Omnisend 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Q140701571, San Mateo, United States, founded 2011. Named in four categories this edition.
Lithuania, founded 2014. Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mobile marketing and push page.
By framing
OneSignalFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOmnisend
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
OneSignal Omnisend first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OneSignal on the left and Omnisend on the right.The direct prompt
OneSignal first, Omnisend not the choice
5 of 14 modelsOmnisend was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
OneSignal67%#1 of 18Omnisend5%#3 of 18OneSignal45%#1 of 14Omnisend4%#5 of 14What the models said about OneSignal
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“OneSignal relies primarily on FCM for Android delivery, which creates reliability issues in markets like China where Google services are blocked.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Budget-friendly, easy setup, good for lean teams | Less enterprise depth for complex journeys” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with: OneSignal (verify new pricing works for you)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend OneSignal as the starting point—it's cost-effective, has strong deliverability, and handles both push and SMS well.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Omnisend
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Avoid e-comm focused ones like Omnisend/Klaviyo (better for B2C retail).” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.