AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Mobile & push › Omnisend vs Klaviyo
Mobile marketing and push · October 2026 Edition

Omnisend vs Klaviyo

Zero of fourteen models named Omnisend first on the direct prompt; zero named Klaviyo. Omnisend was named by eight of the fourteen models and Klaviyo by thirteen and Omnisend carries 12 labels and Klaviyo 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Omnisend

accepted challenger

Lithuania, founded 2014. Named in eight categories this edition.

Klaviyo

accepted challenger

Boston, United States, founded 2012. Named in thirteen categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1228A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Omnisend reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OneSignal was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. OneSignal vs Omnisend · OneSignal vs Klaviyo · Customer.io vs Omnisend

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mobile marketing and push page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OmnisendFirst choices, of fourteen modelsKlaviyo
Direct002 against Klaviyo
Paraphrase111 against Omnisend · 1 against Klaviyo
Comparative02
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained001 against Klaviyo
Negative002 against Klaviyo
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Omnisend and Klaviyo were named in the same answer 116 times, of the 193 answers naming Omnisend and the 390 naming Klaviyo. In those answers Klaviyo took the first choice eighteen times and Omnisend sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Omnisend and Klaviyo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Omnisend Klaviyo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Omnisend on the left and Klaviyo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Omnisend and Klaviyo stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Llama 4 MaverickPushwoosh alternatives: Attentive, Klaviyo

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Customer.io alternatives: ActiveCampaign, Courier, OneSignal, Pushwoosh, Vero
GPT-5.4 miniBraze alternatives: Airship, Iterable, OneSignal
Gemini 3.5 FlashCustomer.io, Sakari alternatives: ActiveCampaign, OneSignal
Perplexity SonarOneSignal alternatives: Attentive, CleverTap, Insider, MoEngage
Grok 4.1 FastCustomer.io alternatives: Braze, OneSignal, Pushwoosh, Vero
Mistral SmallOneSignal, Pushwoosh alternatives: Insider
DeepSeek V4 FlashOneSignal alternatives: Customer.io, Twilio Programmable Messaging
Qwen 3.7 FlashCustomer.io alternatives: Braze, HubSpot Marketing Hub
Kimi K2OneSignal alternatives: ActiveCampaign, Customer.io, Iterable
GLM 4.7 FlashXCustomer.io alternatives: OneSignal
MiniMax M2.5OneSignal alternatives: Braze, MoEngage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Twilio Programmable Messaging
GPT-6 LunaCustomer.io Journeys alternatives: Braze, OneSignal
Muse Glimmer 30BCustomer.io alternatives: Braze, Iterable

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Omnisend leads by four points.
Omnisend5%#3 of 18
Klaviyo2%#7 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Omnisend leads by two points.
Omnisend4%#5 of 14
Klaviyo2%#6 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Omnisend0%#– of 12
Klaviyo0%#12 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Omnisend

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Avoid e-comm focused ones like Omnisend/Klaviyo (better for B2C retail).” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

What the models said about Klaviyo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Attentive and Klaviyo are phenomenal for SMS, but they are built for Shopify/e-commerce. They struggle with B2B data models” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“E-commerce powerhouse (Shopify/others); SMS + email automation, personalization via data; high deliverability” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.