| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 9 of 59 | 21% | 39 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 15 of 66 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 20 of 71 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 93 of 115 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI marketing agents | Marketing | 0% | 112 of 157 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24% | |
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 97 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 72 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 99 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 9 of 59 |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 15 of 66 |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 20 of 71, unchanged |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 93 of 115 |
| AI marketing agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 112 of 157, unchanged |
| Attribution & MMM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 97 of 123, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 142, unchanged |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 99 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your company already runs on Salesforce CRM and has a more complex enterprise marketing operation, Salesforce Agentforce Marketing / Marketing Cloud Next is the stronger choice.” GPT-5.4 mini · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“You already run Salesforce and want marketing tightly integrated with it: evaluate Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement.” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing automation · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you're already deeply invested in Salesforce → Pardot/Marketing Cloud Account Engagement makes sense despite the higher cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If your sales department runs entirely on Salesforce, Salesforce Account Engagement (Pardot) is the logical choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email marketing · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it remains notoriously complex to set up... Avoid if: You do not use Salesforce as your primary CRM.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Pardot: No, just no. Run, run away fast."” Kimi K2 · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Be cautious if you need flexible, customizable reporting, complex automation at scale, or are concerned about long-term product investment.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Marketing automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“It's expensive, starting at $1,250 per month... Pardot only makes sense if you're already committed to Salesforce” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing automation · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 136 of the 153 answers that named Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement and are not a share of its labels.
271 of the 302 domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesforce.com/marketing/cloud, salesforce.com/marketing/engagement, salesforce.com/marketing/customer-engagement-score, salesforce.com/marketing/salesforce-message-credits, salesforce.com/marketing/start-marketing-cloud-next. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: