| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 14 of 59 | 27% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 26 of 115 | 27% | 11 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 123 of 124 | 57% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 61 of 66 | 57% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 58 of 80 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 48 of 117 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI marketing agents | Marketing | 0% | 63 of 157 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24% | |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 107 of 110 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% | |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 129 of 142 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 74 of 83 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 115 of 130 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | |
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 0% | 83 of 113 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 90 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | |
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 38 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 78 of 91 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 14 of 59 |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 26 of 115 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 123 of 124 |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 61 of 66 |
| Mobile & push | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 58 of 80 |
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 94 → 48 of 117 |
| AI marketing agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 157, unchanged |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 107 of 110, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 61 → 129 of 142 |
| Warehouse & ETL | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 83, unchanged |
| Proximity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 115 of 130, unchanged |
| Paid ads | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 113, unchanged |
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 111, unchanged |
| Social media | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 53, unchanged |
| Web analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 78 of 91, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Salesforce Marketing Cloud if you need the most robust, enterprise-grade solution that tightly couples customer data with partner relationship management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Salesforce Marketing Cloud if you're a large B2C enterprise running multi-channel campaigns at scale” Kimi K2 · Marketing automation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Cons: Higher cost, steeper learning curve, and longer implementation times (often 6–12 months).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce marketing · direct prompt · alternative
“if you\u2019re already invested in Salesforce, Salesforce Marketing Cloud is a strong option” Mistral Small · Ecommerce marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Omnichannel Tools (Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Adobe, HubSpot): ... They generally do not handle partners well.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · hard negative
“avoid fully managed "all-in-one" suites (like Segment or Salesforce Marketing Cloud)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Warehouse & ETL · budget prompt · hard negative
“HubSpot and Salesforce Marketing Cloud (Avoid if you only need email marketing)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Overkill for non-enterprise; frequent "avoid" recommendations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mobile & push · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 296 of the 323 answers that named Salesforce Marketing Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
668 of the 668 domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Marketing Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Salesforce Marketing Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesforce.com/crm/cloud-crm, salesforce.com/marketing/cloud, salesforce.com/platform/cloud-data-security, salesforce.com/marketing/salesforce-message-credits, salesforce.com/marketing/salesforce-marketing-champions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Marketing Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce Marketing Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: