Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 103 of 120, unchanged
4 categories · RankedAdobe Campaign
51Judge labels
2First choices
15Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Email marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 107 of 124 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 100% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market107 of 124
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise44 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adobe Campaign for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 107 of 124 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 49 of 66 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 59 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 87 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adobe Campaign held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Channel marketing · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 of 77, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 107 of 124, unchanged |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 49 of 66 |
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 23 of 59 |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 87 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adobe Campaign across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adobe Campaign across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels2
Negative21 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“if your "mid-sized" company actually runs highly complex, enterprise-level campaign orchestration” Perplexity Sonar · Marketing automation · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The interface feels less intuitive, workflows are more complex to build, and the platform requires more technical knowledge to operate effectively, with legacy architecture remaining” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · soft negative
“avoid the massive cost and administrative overhead of legacy enterprise suites (like Salesforce Marketing Cloud or Adobe Campaign)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email marketing · scale prompt · soft negative
“Users frequently report that the platform is "occasionally slow and buggy"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Channel marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Campaign, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Campaign was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Campaign, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Campaign was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Campaign. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 51 answers that named Adobe Campaign and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ventureharbour.com27
sequenzy.com23
insiderone.com18
pipeline.zoominfo.com12
thecmo.com12
g2.com11
klaviyo.com11
blog.hubspot.com8
mailtrap.io8
capterra.com7
137 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Campaign came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
adobe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adobe Campaign takes 0% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.ShowHide
Search and answers
adobe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adobe Campaign takes 0% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“adobe campaign”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 69 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 242,010,966 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,156,506 · 1,068,861 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,595,762
- Paid Google search
- 58 searches its ads show for, about 1,090 clicks and $9,855 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 107 of 124 in channel marketing
Segment leader
10%
Channelscaler
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 51 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on adobe.com
24,667
subdomains included
Content
16,205
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,970
Product · Integration
390 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 13,857 | 0 | 2025-06-01 | DAM, Mobile apps | |
| Report or ebook | 1,261 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | Direct mail, SEO | |
| Conference or event | 481 | 0 | 2024-01-01 | DAM, DMP | |
| Podcast or video | 217 | 0 | 2023-07-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 147 | 0 | 2022-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 82 | 0 | 2022-01-01 | DMP | |
| Case study | 55 | 0 | 2020-11-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 52 | 0 | 2023-02-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 40 | 0 | 2023-04-01 | ||
| News or press | 13 | 0 | 2020-04-01 |
Most recent
- 2025-06-01Power up your productivity with latest adobe illustrator release blog
- 2024-01-01Experience all that summit has to offer conference or event
- 2024-01-01Adobes creative impact shines bright 2023 emmy awards blog
- 2024-01-01Haileybury paves new career pathways adobe acrobat sign blog
- 2024-01-01Ai trends 2024 predictions next wave business innovation blog
- 2024-01-01Adobe introduces major new audio updates premiere pro ahead 2024 sundance film festival blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page adobe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name DAM (27); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Adobe Campaign
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Campaign.ShowHide
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Campaign.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- adobe.com
- Headquarters
- San Jose, United States
- Founded
- 1982
- Employees
- about 25,988 (2021)
- Ownership
- Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a comprehensive solution for the orchestration, launch, and measurement of personalized cross-channel marketing campaigns that fuel meaningful customer experiences
- For
- Marketers across the world
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Adobe Campaign's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: adobe.com/subscription/adobe-campaign-signup.html, adobe.com/creativecloud/campaign/pricing.html, developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/solution/adobe-campaign-classic, developer.adobe.com/client-sdks/solution/adobe-campaign-standard, adobe.com/subscription/adobe-campaign-signup/confirmation.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Campaign's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Campaign, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Campaign by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adobe Campaign is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Campaign, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.