HubSpot AEO Grader

Named in 11 judge labels across 1 category by 5 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 1 first choice, 2 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

4% in AI visibility

Rank 6 of 46 products named in ai visibility and answer engine tracking tools, accepted challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 11 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HubSpot AEO Grader. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	4%	6 of 46	18%	11	accepted challenger

By model

How each model treated HubSpot AEO Grader across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	0	2	0	1	3
Claude Opus 4.8	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Astra	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.6 Sol	1	2	0	0	3
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	0	0	0	0

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with HubSpot AEO for the best balance of price, usability and B2B workflow integration.” GPT-5.6 Sol · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“HubSpot offers a free AEO Grader plus $50/month monitoring, which is the default for teams already on HubSpot” Claude Opus 5 · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Free Diagnostics & Beginners: HubSpot AEO” Gemini 3.1 Pro · AI visibility · budget prompt · alternative

“best affordable option for teams already using HubSpot” GPT-5.6 Sol · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Use it as an initial diagnostic—not as your recurring performance measurement system.” GPT-6 Astra · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative

“Weaker as pure AI trackers” Claude Opus 5 · AI visibility · comparative prompt · soft negative

Names read as HubSpot AEO Grader

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot AEO Grader; a claim can dispute any of them.

HubSpot AEO 7HubSpot 2HubSpot (AEO Tool) 1HubSpot AI Search Grader / AEO Grader 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot AEO Grader, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.