SE Ranking

Named in 16 judge labels across 2 categories by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 3 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

10% in SEO

Rank 3 of 45 products named in seo and content optimization platforms. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SE Ranking. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	10%	3 of 45	0%	9	under 10 labels
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	0%	13 of 46	0%	7	under 10 labels

By model

How each model treated SE Ranking across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Opus 5	1	3	0	4
Claude Opus 4.8	0	3	1	4
GPT-6 Astra	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.1 Pro	1	3	0	4
Perplexity Sonar Pro	1	1	0	2

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want exactly one tool to do everything: Go with SE Ranking.” Gemini 3.1 Pro · SEO · budget prompt · first choice

“SE Ranking is the best all-in-one pick for a limited budget.” Claude Opus 5 · SEO · budget prompt · first choice

“the best single-platform choice is usually SE Ranking” Perplexity Sonar Pro · SEO · budget prompt · first choice

“If you already use Semrush/Ahrefs/SE Ranking, turn on their AI-visibility add-on before buying anything new.” Claude Opus 4.8 · AI visibility · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as SE Ranking

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SE Ranking; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SE Ranking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.