| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 15 of 135 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SEO and content optimization platforms | Marketing | 0% | 16 of 78 | 6% | 17 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 30 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 43 of 115 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 74 of 155 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% | |
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 0% | 40 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38% | |
| PR and media monitoring | Marketing | 0% | 31 of 47 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 0% | 72 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 15 of 135 |
| SEO | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 16 of 78 |
| AI visibility | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 30 of 90 |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 43 of 115 |
| Competitive intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 86, unchanged |
| PR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 47, unchanged |
| Website governance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“use Search Console as the first-party reference point, then treat commercial platform metrics as estimates or workflow aids” GPT-6 Luna · SEO · negative prompt · first choice
“free or low-cost option such as ... GA4, Google Search Console, Canva, or HubSpot's free tier” Llama 4 Maverick · Content marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“rely on Google Search Console (GSC) as your ultimate source of truth” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SEO · negative prompt · first choice
“It is the most accurate tool on earth for seeing exactly which keywords are driving impressions and clicks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SEO · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“free performance tracking tool, useful for indexing and search visibility data but not a full optimization suite” Perplexity Sonar · SEO · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 69 answers that named Google Search Console and are not a share of its labels.
130 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming Google Search Console came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 707 | undated | |||
| Blog | 371 | 0 | 2018-12-13 | Mobile apps | |
| Comparison | 35 | undated | |||
| News or press | 18 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2018-12-13 |
Every page search.google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Google Search Console's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: search.google.com/search-console/about, search.google.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Search Console's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Search Console, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Search Console by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: