Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 19 of 80
1 category · Named, not rankedScreaming Frog
23Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Screaming Frog was named 9 times in SEO, where Semrush led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 84
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 78
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise58 of 59
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In seo · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Screaming Frog for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO and content optimization platforms | Marketing | 0% | 18 of 78 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Screaming Frog held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SEO · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 19 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 71 → 57 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 18 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Screaming Frog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Screaming Frog across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Consider starting with free tools like Google Search Console, Screaming Frog, and Google Business Profile” MiniMax M2.5 · SEO · negative prompt · alternative
“Stick with established tools (Ahrefs, Semrush, Screaming Frog) that focus on data auditing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SEO · negative prompt · alternative
“"Screaming Frog remains the gold standard for technical site audits."” Muse Glimmer 30B · SEO · comparative prompt · alternative
“For technical SEO: Screaming Frog for deep site analysis” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SEO · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“technical crawler for audits rather than a full SEO management suite” Perplexity Sonar · SEO · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Screaming Frog, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Screaming Frog was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Screaming Frog, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Screaming Frog was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Screaming Frog. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 23 answers that named Screaming Frog and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com10
zapier.com9
g2.com8
onelittleweb.com7
searchatlas.com7
conductor.com6
learn.g2.com6
rankability.com5
techradar.com5
developers.google.com4
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Screaming Frog came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
screamingfrog.co.uk is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Screaming Frog takes 0% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
screamingfrog.co.uk is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Screaming Frog takes 0% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“screaming frog”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1,357 a month
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 78 in SEO
Segment leader
21%
Semrush
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on screamingfrog.co.uk
658
subdomains included
Content
182
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 175 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2025-06-09 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2016-07-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2011-03-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2020-10-08 | SEO | |
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2018-05-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2021-10-20 | SEO |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09San diego 26 blog
- 2026-08-11Seo ppc search insights blog
- 2026-05-19Seo spider 24 blog
- 2026-04-29Log file analyser 7 0 blog
- 2026-04-27The brightonseo crawling clinic april may 26 blog
- 2026-04-21Generate markdown at scale blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page screamingfrog.co.uk exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Screaming Frog
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Screaming Frog; a claim can dispute any of them.
Screaming Frog Free 1
Follow Screaming Frog
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Screaming Frog.ShowHide
The company
Screaming Frog.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- screamingfrog.co.uk
- Headquarters
- United Kingdom
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- SEO agency and creators of the famous website crawler and log file analyser tools
- For
- large brands to small and medium sized enterprises
- Price stated
- Download for free, or buy a licence for additional features. screamingfrog.co.uk
- Starting price
- 199 screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Download for free screamingfrog.co.uk
- Integrations claimed
- 4 screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/pricing
- Customers named
- moo.comDogBuddy
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Screaming Frog's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: screamingfrog.co.uk, screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/pricing, screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/issues/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Screaming Frog's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Screaming Frog, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Screaming Frog by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Screaming Frog is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Screaming Frog, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.