Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 99 → 80 of 80
2 categories · RankedConductor
119Judge labels
26First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
40% in SEO for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Conductor →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business84 of 84
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 78
3%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 59
40%65 labels
endorsed leader
In seo · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Conductor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO and content optimization platforms | Marketing | 3% | 10 of 78 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 21 of 90 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Conductor held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SEO · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 71
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 41% → 39%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
39%from 41% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 58, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 of 78, unchanged |
| AI visibility | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 21 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Conductor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Conductor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct25 labels10
Paraphrase14 labels8
Comparative24 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels5
Scale-constrained25 labels3
Negative17 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative119 labels in all, every segment counted; 26 of the 43 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tools using official APIs (e.g., Conductor, Semrush): More reliable, real-time data; better for enterprises.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · negative prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually Conductor if your priority is a content-led SEO platform” GPT-5.4 mini · SEO · direct prompt · first choice
“Widely regarded as a premier enterprise SEO platform. It excels at cross-team collaboration” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SEO · scale prompt · first choice
“1. Conductor 🏆 *Enterprise Winner* ... Only true all-in-one platform” Kimi K2 · AI visibility · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you cannot afford the $20,000+/year price tag, rigid annual contracts, and slow onboarding times of legacy enterprise suites like Conductor or BrightEdge” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SEO · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Conductor, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conductor was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Conductor, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conductor was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conductor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 119 answers that named Conductor and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
conductor.comYour site86
airops.com41
trysight.ai35
blog.hubspot.com32
g2.com27
rankability.com27
gartner.com25
stackmatix.com24
searchatlas.com23
ahrefs.com22
256 of the 342 domain citations in answers naming Conductor came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
conductor.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Conductor takes 3% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
conductor.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Conductor takes 3% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “seo and content optimization platform”
8
Position for “best seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 49,500 a month (“conductor”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 26,956 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 45,843 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,694 · 619 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 15,334
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 10 of 78 in SEO
Segment leader
21%
Semrush
- First choices
- 26 across its categories
- Named in
- 119 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 117 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on conductor.com
2,382
subdomains included
Content
1,089
counted in the table below
Documentation
626
Product · Integration
89 · 25
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 548 | undated | SEO | ||
| Blog | 211 | undated | SEO | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 155 | undated | SEO | ||
| Case study | 73 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 43 | undated | SEO | ||
| Comparison | 35 | undated | SEO | ||
| Template or tool | 22 | undated | SEO | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 28, 2026C3 2026Convene One Liberty Plaza, 1 Liberty St, New York, NY 10006, New York, US · hosts
As the event pages on conductor.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page conductor.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Conductor
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Conductor.ShowHide
The company
Conductor.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- conductor.com
- Headquarters
- New York City, United States
- Founded
- 2006
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 for Enterprise AEO
- For
- enterprise teams
- Price stated
- Plans for enterprises at every stage of growth conductor.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get a Free AI Visibility Analysis conductor.com
- Certifications
- ISO 42001ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IICCPAGDPR
- Customers named
- BraunAbilityInternational Institute for LearningFreshBooksHG InsightsBoston Globe MediaTitle NineClutchOverdrive
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Conductor's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: conductor.com, conductor.com/pricing, conductor.com/security, conductor.com/platform, conductor.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conductor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conductor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conductor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Conductor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conductor, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.