AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Profound · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Profound

126Judge labels
37First choices
27Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
55% in AI visibility for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 90 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Profound →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Profound for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI visibility and answer engine tracking toolsMarketing15%3 of 9029%42criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 10% → 15%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI marketing agentsMarketing0%62 of 1570%2under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, Profound held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI visibility · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 100 → 17 of 92
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 10% → 15%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 of 85, unchanged
Enterprise▼−9Since September 2026: 63% → 53%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
53%from 63% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 1 of 74, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI visibility10%15%▲+5Since September 2026: 10% → 15%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 → 3 of 90
AI marketing agents0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 62 of 157, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Profound across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511024
GPT-5.4 mini20114
Gemini 3.5 Flash22015
Perplexity Sonar20002
Grok 4.1 Fast03036
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash12104
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K211035
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.511103
GPT-6 Luna11002
Muse Glimmer 30B20103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels18
Paraphrase18 labels8
Comparative29 labels17not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels3
Scale-constrained14 labels8
Negative22 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative126 labels in all, every segment counted; 37 of the 57 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A purpose-built Answer Engine Optimization platform that combines the industry's deepest AI visibility data with content creation, automated workflows, agent analytics, and real-time attribution.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI visibility · comparative prompt · first choice
“Peec AI or Profound are most likely to deliver the right balance of features, analytics depth, and team-focused pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice
“the best single pick is usually Profound if your priority is AI visibility / answer-engine tracking specifically” GPT-5.4 mini · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice
“Profound: The Enterprise Standard ... Key differentiator: Deepest technical analytics, enterprise security compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools to Approach with Extra Caution or Avoid (if possible): - Profound: Privacy concerns” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid - Profound ($399+/mo) – Overkill unless you're enterprise” Kimi K2 · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Profound ($99+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · budget prompt · hard negative
“they have phased out their lower self-serve tiers for brands. Their basic self-serve tiers have historically gated models like Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and Grok” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Profound, over the 126 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Profound was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ahrefs Brand Radar39 of 1261Not among the top eight
Conductor27 of 1267Not among the top eight
AthenaHQ18 of 1262Not among the top eight
AirOps16 of 1261Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Profound. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 126 of the 126 answers that named Profound and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com59
tryprofound.comYour site56
airops.com43
business.com39
wellows.com38
conductor.com36
semrush.com33
integrate.io29
g2.com27
hubspot.com27

331 of the 387 domain citations in answers naming Profound came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

tryprofound.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Profound takes 15% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
1
Position for “best ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“profound”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,284 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 42,887 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,329 · 213 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,675
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 23 clicks and $318 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
118+ ads · 64 text, 32 video, 22 image · 50 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Cooper Square Technologies, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 117 in the year, 1 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
15%
rank 3 of 90 in AI visibility
Segment leader
20%
Otterly
First choices
37 across its categories
Named in
126 answers
Its own site cited
in 126 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on tryprofound.com
1,103
subdomains included
Content
366
counted in the table below
Documentation
341
Product · Integration
27 · 65
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog226272026-09-29
Webinar or virtual event30undated
Report or ebook24undated
Case study21162026-09-03
News or press21102026-09-21
Comparison1822026-07-30
Conference or event1412026-10-03
Podcast or video962026-09-16
Glossary or explainer302026-01-29

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on tryprofound.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page tryprofound.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Profound

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Profound; a claim can dispute any of them.
Profound AI 3

Follow Profound

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Profound is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI platform to power your marketing; the AI marketing platform built for the agentic era.
For
marketers
Price stated
Trial Free; Enterprise Custom tryprofound.com/pricing
Starting price
Free tryprofound.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Trial tryprofound.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
200 tryprofound.com · 9 tryprofound.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2SOC 2 Type II
Hosting
Worldwide
Customers named
PlaidMongoDBGR0RampStatsigFigmaWalmartChime

What Profound's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tryprofound.com, tryprofound.com/pricing, trust.tryprofound.com, tryprofound.com/features/aim, tryprofound.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Profound's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Profound, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Profound by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Profound is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Profound, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tryprofound.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Profound is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Profound is among the products AI models recommend first in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/ai-visibility-tracking/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/profound--ai-visibility-tracking-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/ai-visibility-tracking/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/profound--ai-visibility-tracking-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/ai-visibility-tracking/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/profound--ai-visibility-tracking-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.