Otterly

Named in 24 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 7 first choices, 4 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

25% in AI visibility

Rank 2 of 46 products named in ai visibility and answer engine tracking tools, accepted challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 24 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Otterly. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	25%	2 of 46	17%	24	accepted challenger

By model

How each model treated Otterly across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	1	2	1	1	5
Claude Opus 4.8	3	1	2	0	6
GPT-6 Astra	1	1	0	1	3
GPT-5.6 Sol	1	1	0	1	3
Gemini 3.1 Pro	1	3	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar Pro	1	1	0	1	3

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best overall pick is usually Otterly.AI because it’s consistently positioned as the cheapest serious option” Perplexity Sonar Pro · AI visibility · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd start with Otterly.AI Lite if your budget is around $30/month and you're tracking one company.” GPT-6 Astra · AI visibility · budget prompt · first choice

“Best budget choice: OtterlyAI ... OtterlyAI Lite is the strongest starting point” GPT-5.6 Sol · AI visibility · budget prompt · first choice

“(Otterly.ai and Peec AI are frequently cited as accessible entry points)” Claude Opus 4.8 · AI visibility · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Choosing it mainly because of the $29 price | The base plan covers four engines; Claude, Gemini and Google AI Mode are add-ons.” GPT-5.6 Sol · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative

“it appears better suited to lightweight monitoring than a full mid-market B2B software workflow” Perplexity Sonar Pro · AI visibility · direct prompt · soft negative

“I wouldn’t use 15 prompts to support sweeping conclusions about a multi-product business.” GPT-6 Astra · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative

“Shallow analytics; you'll outgrow it” Claude Opus 5 · AI visibility · direct prompt · soft negative

Names read as Otterly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Otterly; a claim can dispute any of them.

Otterly.ai 9OtterlyAI 4Otterly AI 3Otterly.AI 3Otterly.AI Lite 1OtterlyAI Lite 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Otterly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.