AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › AI visibility › Otterly vs Rankscale
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools · October 2026 Edition

Otterly vs Rankscale

One of fourteen models named Otterly first on the direct prompt; zero named Rankscale. Otterly was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Rankscale by eight and Otterly carries 36 labels and Rankscale 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Otterly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Rankscale

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share20%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels3612A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Otterly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Peec AI was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Otterly vs Peec AI · Otterly vs Profound · Otterly vs HubSpot AEO Grader

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OtterlyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRankscale
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative21
Budget-constrained93
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Otterly · 1 against Rankscale
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Otterly and Rankscale were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 103 answers naming Otterly and the 32 naming Rankscale. In those answers Rankscale took the first choice three times and Otterly ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Otterly and Rankscale stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Otterly Rankscale first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Otterly on the left and Rankscale on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Otterly and Rankscale stood in it.

Otterly first, Rankscale an alternative

1 of 14 modelsRankscale was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXOtterly alternatives: Rankscale, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Peec AI, Profound alternatives: HubSpot AEO Grader, Otterly
Kimi K2Peec AI alternatives: Otterly, Searchable
GPT-6 LunaPeec AI alternatives: Otterly, Profound

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniProfound alternatives: Bluefish, BrightEdge AI Catalyst, Conductor, HubSpot AEO Grader, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence
Gemini 3.5 FlashOrchly AI alternatives: Ahrefs Brand Radar, GrackerAI, Peec AI, Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Perplexity SonarProfound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit alternatives: Quattr
Grok 4.20Peec AI alternatives: AthenaHQ, HubSpot AEO Grader, Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Mistral SmallProfound, SE Ranking alternatives: Peec AI, Qwairy
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot AEO Grader alternatives: Cognizo, Omnibound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Llama 4 MaverickPeec AI alternatives: HubSpot AEO Grader, Qwairy, SE Ranking
Qwen 3.7 FlashDeepSmith alternatives: Peec AI, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
MiniMax M2.5CrowdReply alternatives: Cognizo
Muse Glimmer 30BPeec AI, Profound alternatives: Qwairy, SE Ranking

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Otterly leads by twenty-five points.
Otterly31%#1 of 7
Rankscale6%#5 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Otterly leads by fifteen points.
Otterly20%#1 of 9
Rankscale5%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Rankscale leads at enterprise.
Rankscale2%#– of 9
Otterly0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Otterly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“OtterlyAI (~$29-49/month) The concern: "A mirror, not a GPS"... weak actionable recommendations” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“General Red Flags Across Many Tools (e.g., Otterly.ai, Peec AI, Scrunch, Geneo, Rankscale):” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Otterly AI at $29/month or Rankscale AI at $20/month offer the best value, with Otterly AI being particularly attractive due to its quick implementation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Otterly AI at $29/mo is the practical minimum viable option for daily, multi-engine AI visibility tracking” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“the best AI visibility and answer engine tracking tool for a mid-market B2B company is Otterly.AI” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Rankscale

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“General Red Flags Across Many Tools (e.g., Otterly.ai, Peec AI, Scrunch, Geneo, Rankscale):” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Otterly AI at $29/month or Rankscale AI at $20/month offer the best value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Rankscale AI is often the best fit because it starts around $20/month” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“For broad, multi‑engine monitoring: Otterly.AI or Rankscale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.