Otterly vs Scrunch
Zero of twelve models named Otterly first on the direct prompt; one named Scrunch. Otterly was named by twelve of the twelve models and Scrunch by nine and Otterly carries 43 labels and Scrunch 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
OtterlyFirst choices, of twelve modelsScrunch
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Otterly and Scrunch were named in the same answer twenty-eight times, of the 110 answers naming Otterly and the 56 naming Scrunch. In those answers Scrunch took the first choice one time and Otterly three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Otterly Scrunch first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Otterly on the left and Scrunch on the right.The direct prompt
Scrunch first, Otterly not the choice
1 of 12 modelsOtterly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Otterly47%#1 of 9Scrunch0%#– of 9Scrunch2%#3 of 9Otterly0%#9 of 9What the models said about Otterly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Peec AI, Otterly AI, AthenaHQ: Frequent complaints on plan limits ... synthetic data flaws” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Too limited for serious use: Lite plan includes only 15 prompts across 3 engines” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Otterly AI or pure monitoring versions of Peec AI provide excellent data but lack built-in workflows” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best starting point is usually Otterly.AI... Best overall low-budget pick: Otterly.AI” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Otterly.AI stands out as the best starting option for AI visibility and answer engine tracking.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Budget Option: Otterly.ai offers AI search monitoring starting at $29/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Scrunch
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Profound ($499+/month) or Scrunch AI ($250/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profound or Scrunch AI. Both provide deep developer APIs, agent analytics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“it is recommended to look at tools such as Profound, Scrunch, and AthenaHQ” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“I recommend Scrunch as the primary choice for pure-play AI visibility” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.