Rankscale vs Scrunch
Zero of twelve models named Rankscale first on the direct prompt; one named Scrunch. Rankscale was named by ten of the twelve models and Scrunch by nine and Rankscale carries 16 labels and Scrunch 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
RankscaleFirst choices, of twelve modelsScrunch
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Rankscale and Scrunch were named in the same answer twelve times, of the 34 answers naming Rankscale and the 56 naming Scrunch. In those answers Scrunch took the first choice one time and Rankscale zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Rankscale Scrunch first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Rankscale on the left and Scrunch on the right.The direct prompt
Scrunch first, Rankscale not the choice
1 of 12 modelsRankscale was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Scrunch2%#3 of 9Rankscale0%#– of 9What the models said about Rankscale
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best For: Absolute lowest entry price and actionable site diagnostics... it is exceptionally cost-effective.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Rankscale if you want the absolute lowest cost with the broadest platform coverage” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with RankScale AI ($20/month) or Otterly.AI ($29/month)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Scrunch
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Profound ($499+/month) or Scrunch AI ($250/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profound or Scrunch AI. Both provide deep developer APIs, agent analytics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“it is recommended to look at tools such as Profound, Scrunch, and AthenaHQ” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“I recommend Scrunch as the primary choice for pure-play AI visibility” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.