Peec AI vs Scrunch
Three of twelve models named Peec AI first on the direct prompt; one named Scrunch. Peec AI was named by nine of the twelve models and Scrunch by nine and Peec AI carries 31 labels and Scrunch 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
Peec AIFirst choices, of twelve modelsScrunch
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Peec AI and Scrunch were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 87 answers naming Peec AI and the 56 naming Scrunch. In those answers Scrunch took the first choice four times and Peec AI two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Peec AI Scrunch first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Peec AI on the left and Scrunch on the right.The direct prompt
Peec AI first, Scrunch not the choice
3 of 12 modelsScrunch was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Scrunch first, Peec AI an alternative
1 of 12 modelsPeec AI was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Peec AI8%#4 of 11Scrunch8%#5 of 11Peec AI2%#5 of 9Scrunch2%#3 of 9What the models said about Peec AI
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Peec AI, Otterly AI, AthenaHQ: Frequent complaints on plan limits ... Peec criticized for agencies/SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Hidden costs: Real pricing is 30-60% above headline prices... No actionability... No ROI attribution” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“pure monitoring versions of Peec AI provide excellent data but lack built-in workflows to audit or fix your content” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Peec AI stands out as the best AI visibility and answer engine tracking tool for a mid-market B2B company.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Peec AI offers the best balance of comprehensive tracking, competitive insights, and reasonable pricing” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Peec AI is the strongest recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Scrunch
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise tools like Profound ($499+/month) or Scrunch AI ($250/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Profound or Scrunch AI. Both provide deep developer APIs, agent analytics” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“it is recommended to look at tools such as Profound, Scrunch, and AthenaHQ” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · first choice
“I recommend Scrunch as the primary choice for pure-play AI visibility” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.