AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › AI visibility › Peec AI vs Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools · October 2026 Edition

Peec AI vs Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Six of fourteen models named Peec AI first on the direct prompt; one named Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit. Peec AI was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit by thirteen and Peec AI carries 40 labels and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit 38, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Peec AI

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

By Semrush, Boston, United States, founded 2008. Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share16%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%18%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4038A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Peec AI reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Profound was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Otterly vs Peec AI · Otterly vs Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit · Peec AI vs Profound

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Peec AIFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSemrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Direct61
Paraphrase32
Comparative10
Budget-constrained001 against Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Scale-constrained002 against Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Negative013 against Peec AI · 4 against Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Peec AI and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit were named in the same answer fifty-one times, of the 93 answers naming Peec AI and the 109 naming Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit. In those answers Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit took the first choice seven times and Peec AI six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Peec AI and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Peec AI Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Peec AI on the left and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Peec AI and Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit stood in it.

Peec AI first, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit an alternative

6 of 14 modelsSemrush AI Visibility Toolkit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Peec AI, Profound alternatives: HubSpot AEO Grader, Otterly
Grok 4.20Peec AI alternatives: AthenaHQ, HubSpot AEO Grader, Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Llama 4 MaverickPeec AI alternatives: HubSpot AEO Grader, Qwairy, SE Ranking
Kimi K2Peec AI alternatives: Otterly, Searchable
GPT-6 LunaPeec AI alternatives: Otterly, Profound
Muse Glimmer 30BPeec AI, Profound alternatives: Qwairy, SE Ranking

Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit first, Peec AI not the choice

1 of 14 modelsPeec AI was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarProfound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit alternatives: Quattr

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniProfound alternatives: Bluefish, BrightEdge AI Catalyst, Conductor, HubSpot AEO Grader, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence
Gemini 3.5 FlashOrchly AI alternatives: Ahrefs Brand Radar, GrackerAI, Peec AI, Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Mistral SmallProfound, SE Ranking alternatives: Peec AI, Qwairy
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot AEO Grader alternatives: Cognizo, Omnibound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Qwen 3.7 FlashDeepSmith alternatives: Peec AI, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
GLM 4.7 FlashXOtterly alternatives: Rankscale, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
MiniMax M2.5CrowdReply alternatives: Cognizo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Peec AI leads by four points.
Peec AI12%#3 of 7
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit8%#4 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Peec AI leads by eleven points.
Peec AI16%#2 of 9
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit5%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Peec AI6%#4 of 9
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit6%#3 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Peec AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“General Red Flags Across Many Tools (e.g., Otterly.ai, Peec AI, Scrunch, Geneo, Rankscale):” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The concern: Restrictive limits - 25-prompt Starter limit is restrictive” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Peec AI only tracks three answer engines in baseline plans” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Peec AI if you want a more affordable, marketer-friendly starter that still monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and other answer engines” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with SE Visible at $99/month ... or Peec AI if you prefer more hands-on control and broader engine coverage” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want an affordable, standalone tool that your whole team can easily use: Go with Peec AI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Mid-market companies often struggle with "pay-per-keyword" pricing from massive enterprise suites (like Semrush/Ahrefs) which can get astronomically expensive” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Semrush describes its score as a benchmark based on topic coverage and mention consistency... it isn't the same thing as buyer exposure, clicks, or sales.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“A 7 Jan 2026 check of "AI visibility checkers" tested SEMrush, AmIVisibleOnAI, and Neil Patel's Ubersuggest ... The results were described as shocking” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools using official APIs (e.g., Conductor, Semrush): More reliable, real-time data” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit if you want the best balance” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.