Small business▲+7Since September 2026: 4% → 12%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 92
1 category · RankedPeec AI
93Judge labels
18First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in AI visibility for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 90 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 40 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Peec AI →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 94
12%30 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 90
16%40 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 79
6%23 labels
criticized challenger
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Peec AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 16% | 2 of 90 | 8% | 40 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Peec AI held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 85
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 8% | 12% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 2 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Peec AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Peec AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels8
Paraphrase16 labels4
Comparative22 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels3
Scale-constrained10 labels3
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative93 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Peec AI if you want a more affordable, marketer-friendly starter that still monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and other answer engines” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with SE Visible at $99/month ... or Peec AI if you prefer more hands-on control and broader engine coverage” Kimi K2 · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want an affordable, standalone tool that your whole team can easily use: Go with Peec AI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Peec AI stands out as the top recommendation for a mid-market B2B company” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“General Red Flags Across Many Tools (e.g., Otterly.ai, Peec AI, Scrunch, Geneo, Rankscale):” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative
“The concern: Restrictive limits - 25-prompt Starter limit is restrictive” Kimi K2 · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative
“Peec AI only tracks three answer engines in baseline plans” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Peec AI, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Peec AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Peec AI, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Peec AI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Peec AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 93 answers that named Peec AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com43
semrush.com37
airops.com32
business.com32
tryprofound.com31
wellows.com27
hubspot.com23
conductor.com21
integrate.io21
otterly.ai21
288 of the 288 domain citations in answers naming Peec AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
peec.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Peec AI takes 16% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
peec.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Peec AI takes 16% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“peec ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,162 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 79 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,045
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 90 in AI visibility
Segment leader
20%
Otterly
- First choices
- 18 across its categories
- Named in
- 93 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 93 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peec.ai
449
subdomains included
Content
118
counted in the table below
Documentation
177
Product · Integration
4 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 57 | 0 | 2026-02-01 | ||
| Blog | 45 | 9 | 2026-09-29 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 7 | 2 | 2026-07-28 | SEO | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 2 | 2026-07-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29ChatGPT visibility tracker - Peec AI blog
- 2026-09-29Google AI Mode visibility tracker - Peec AI blog
- 2026-09-29Ai search geo statistics blog
- 2026-09-22Brand perception webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-14Introducing brand perception blog
- 2026-09-04ChatGPT built its own search index - Peec AI blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peec.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Peec AI
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Peec AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Peec.ai 2Peec 1Peec AI / Rankscale 1
Follow Peec AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Peec AI is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Peec AI is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI search analytics for marketing teams
- For
- marketing teams
- Price stated
- Monthly; Annual; Custom; 15% discount for customers who choose annual billing peec.ai/pricing
- Starting price
- €47 peec.ai/product/shopping
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial peec.ai
- Certifications
- 4.9/5 on G2
- Customers named
- GraphiteGlideAmsive
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Peec AI's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: peec.ai, peec.ai/pricing, peec.ai/product/shopping. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Peec AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Peec AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Peec AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Peec AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Peec AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Peec AI is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Peec AI is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHidePeec AI is among the products AI models recommend first in AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.