Peec AI

Named in 27 judge labels across 2 categories by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 7 first choices, 3 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

25% in AI visibility

Rank 1 of 46 products named in ai visibility and answer engine tracking tools, accepted challenger. 3 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 26 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Peec AI. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	25%	1 of 46	12%	26	accepted challenger
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	0%	21 of 45	0%	1	under 10 labels

By model

How each model treated Peec AI across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	2	2	1	1	6
Claude Opus 4.8	1	0	3	0	4
GPT-6 Astra	4	0	0	1	5
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	4	0	1	5
Gemini 3.1 Pro	1	2	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	4	0	0	4

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Widely considered the sweet spot for B2B SaaS marketing teams and agencies... demo Peec AI or Radarkit” Gemini 3.1 Pro · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice

“(Otterly.ai and Peec AI are frequently cited as accessible entry points)” Claude Opus 4.8 · AI visibility · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd start with Peec AI Pro for a mid-market B2B software company” GPT-6 Astra · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice

“Visibility and source analysis: start with Peec or Otterly.” GPT-6 Astra · AI visibility · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Worth evaluating, but I would interpret its results as visibility under sampled conditions—not a census of what buyers see.” GPT-6 Astra · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative

“Standard plans let you choose three models; additional models cost extra, and API access is positioned for Enterprise.” GPT-5.6 Sol · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative

“Excellent for agencies, overkill for one brand.” Claude Opus 5 · AI visibility · budget prompt · soft negative

Names read as Peec AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Peec AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Peec 2Peec AI Pro 1Peec.ai 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Peec AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.