AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools · October 2026 Edition
Peec AI vs SE Ranking
Six of fourteen models named Peec AI first on the direct prompt; one named SE Ranking. Peec AI was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SE Ranking by ten and Peec AI carries 40 labels and SE Ranking 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
United States, founded 2012. Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share16%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4013A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Peec AI reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Profound was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Otterly vs Peec AI · Otterly vs SE Ranking · Peec AI vs Profound
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Peec AIFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSE Ranking
Direct61
Paraphrase30
Comparative10
Budget-constrained011 against SE Ranking
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Peec AI · 1 against SE Ranking
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Peec AI and SE Ranking stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Peec AI SE Ranking first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Peec AI on the left and SE Ranking on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Peec AI and SE Ranking stood in it.
Peec AI first, SE Ranking an alternative
6 of 14 modelsSE Ranking was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Peec AI, Profound alternatives: HubSpot AEO Grader, Otterly
Grok 4.20Peec AI alternatives: AthenaHQ, HubSpot AEO Grader, Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Llama 4 MaverickPeec AI alternatives: HubSpot AEO Grader, Qwairy, SE Ranking
Kimi K2Peec AI alternatives: Otterly, Searchable
GPT-6 LunaPeec AI alternatives: Otterly, Profound
Muse Glimmer 30BPeec AI, Profound alternatives: Qwairy, SE Ranking
SE Ranking first, Peec AI an alternative
1 of 14 modelsPeec AI was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallProfound, SE Ranking alternatives: Peec AI, Qwairy
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashOrchly AI alternatives: Ahrefs Brand Radar, GrackerAI, Peec AI, Profound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Qwen 3.7 FlashDeepSmith alternatives: Peec AI, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniProfound alternatives: Bluefish, BrightEdge AI Catalyst, Conductor, HubSpot AEO Grader, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Similarweb AI Search Intelligence
Perplexity SonarProfound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit alternatives: Quattr
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot AEO Grader alternatives: Cognizo, Omnibound, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
GLM 4.7 FlashXOtterly alternatives: Rankscale, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
MiniMax M2.5CrowdReply alternatives: Cognizo
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Peec AI leads by twelve points.
Peec AI12%#3 of 7SE Ranking0%#– of 7Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
SE Ranking is not named for this buyer.
Peec AI6%#4 of 9SE Ranking—not namedWhat the models said about Peec AI
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“General Red Flags Across Many Tools (e.g., Otterly.ai, Peec AI, Scrunch, Geneo, Rankscale):” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The concern: Restrictive limits - 25-prompt Starter limit is restrictive” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Peec AI only tracks three answer engines in baseline plans” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Peec AI if you want a more affordable, marketer-friendly starter that still monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and other answer engines” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with SE Visible at $99/month ... or Peec AI if you prefer more hands-on control and broader engine coverage” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want an affordable, standalone tool that your whole team can easily use: Go with Peec AI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about SE Ranking
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“The original in-suite "AI Results Tracker" requires a complex prompt-cap credit model” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically overkill if you only need AI monitoring” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“### 1. SE Ranking (Best Overall Value)... widely considered the best "budget-friendly" all-in-one SEO suite” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Otterly vs Peec AIOtterly vs SE RankingPeec AI vs ProfoundPeec AI vs HubSpot AEO GraderPeec AI vs Semrush AI Visibility ToolkitPeec AI vs RankscalePeec AI vs ScrunchProfound vs SE RankingHubSpot AEO Grader vs SE RankingSemrush AI Visibility Toolkit vs SE RankingRankscale vs SE RankingSE Ranking vs ScrunchAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full AI visibility standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.