Otterly vs Profound
Zero of twelve models named Otterly first on the direct prompt; zero named Profound. Both were named by all twelve models and Otterly carries 43 labels and Profound 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools page.
By framing
OtterlyFirst choices, of twelve modelsProfound
The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Otterly47%#1 of 9Profound0%#9 of 9Profound63%#1 of 9Otterly0%#9 of 9What the models said about Otterly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Peec AI, Otterly AI, AthenaHQ: Frequent complaints on plan limits ... synthetic data flaws” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Too limited for serious use: Lite plan includes only 15 prompts across 3 engines” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Otterly AI or pure monitoring versions of Peec AI provide excellent data but lack built-in workflows” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best starting point is usually Otterly.AI... Best overall low-budget pick: Otterly.AI” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Otterly.AI stands out as the best starting option for AI visibility and answer engine tracking.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Budget Option: Otterly.ai offers AI search monitoring starting at $29/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Profound
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Price issue: $499/month for Lite plan is 48% more expensive than the category average... G2 reviews cite instability, slowness, and overwhelming dashboards” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Profound: Major red flags—allegations of using browser extension clickstream data ... experts call it ethically questionable” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Profound ($499+/month)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Shortlist 3-5: Profound (enterprise security), AirOps (tracking-to-content loop), Semrush/Ahrefs (if you use SEO tools).” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Enterprise-grade with data depth and competitive intelligence | Large enterprises needing comprehensive tracking” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“"We're an enterprise—we need every possible engine covered." → Profound or Peec AI” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.