AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › BrightEdge · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

BrightEdge

72Judge labels
6First choices
23Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in SEO for enterprise buyers
Rank 52 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 43% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In seo · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BrightEdge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SEO and content optimization platformsMarketing0%52 of 7843%7under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, BrightEdge held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · SEO · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 101 → 79 of 80
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 49 of 71
Enterprise▲+6Since September 2026: 7% → 14%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 5 → 2 of 58

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
SEO2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 52 of 78

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated BrightEdge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels4
Comparative14 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Use BrightEdge or Conductor if you need enterprise-scale governance and reporting.” Perplexity Sonar · SEO · comparative prompt · alternative
“enterprise options like seoClarity, Conductor, or BrightEdge that handle high-volume sites” Grok 4.1 Fast · SEO · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms like BrightEdge and Frase market AI-search visibility and optimization heavily... you should verify how they measure “AI citations”” GPT-5.4 mini · SEO · negative prompt · soft negative
“you cannot afford the $20,000+/year price tag... of legacy enterprise suites like Conductor or BrightEdge” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SEO · direct prompt · soft negative
“High cost; may be overkill at 500 people” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SEO · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BrightEdge, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BrightEdge was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Conductor67 of 7222Not among the top eight
Semrush53 of 728Not among the top eight
seoClarity42 of 725Not among the top eight
Ahrefs40 of 723Not among the top eight
Clearscope37 of 726Not among the top eight
Surfer SEO31 of 724Not among the top eight
MarketMuse27 of 721Not among the top eight
Botify25 of 720Not among the top eight
Moz15 of 720Not among the top eight
Siteimprove11 of 720Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BrightEdge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 72 answers that named BrightEdge and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

conductor.com52
trysight.ai28
ahrefs.com21
airops.com20
searchatlas.com19
gartner.com18
rankability.com18
siteimprove.com18
blog.hubspot.com16
slatehq.com16

226 of the 226 domain citations in answers naming BrightEdge came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

brightedge.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BrightEdge takes 0% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“brightedge”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
180 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 27,218 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,127 · 475 in the top three
Sites linking to it
16,129
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
5 ads · 5 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as BrightEdge Technologies, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 2 in the year, 3 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 78 in SEO
Segment leader
21%
Semrush
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
72 answers
Its own site cited
in 71 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on brightedge.com
3,432
subdomains included
Content
2,493
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
47 · 5
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,31232026-09-21SEO, Tag management
Webinar or virtual event26512026-09-23SEO, ABM
Glossary or explainer245undatedSEO, Mobile apps
Conference or event15502017-12-18SEO
Podcast or video141undatedSEO
Report or ebook11842026-07-20SEO
News or press9732026-09-24SEO
Case study8822026-09-24SEO
Template or tool4402017-11-20SEO
Comparison2802026-06-18SEO

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on brightedge.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page brightedge.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow BrightEdge

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BrightEdge is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The #1 AI-Powered SEO & AEO Platform
For
marketers
Certifications
ISO 42001:2023ISO 27001:2022ISO 27701:2019SOC2
Customers named
Cleveland ClinicWileyL’OréalMedableGlobal Services ProviderNinjaOneBloomfireArm
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What BrightEdge's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: brightedge.com, brightedge.com/trust, brightedge.com/solutions/b2b, brightedge.com/resources/case-studies, brightedge.com/about/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BrightEdge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BrightEdge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BrightEdge by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where BrightEdge is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name BrightEdge, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at brightedge.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.