Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 8 of 80
1 category · Named, not rankedMangools
20Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mangools was named 9 times in SEO, where Semrush led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 84
3%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 78
3%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise46 of 59
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In seo · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mangools for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO and content optimization platforms | Marketing | 3% | 11 of 78 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mangools held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SEO · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 10 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 → 45 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 11 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mangools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mangools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best SEO and content optimization platform is generally Mangools or SE Ranking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SEO · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Mangools - starts at $37.70/month” Llama 4 Maverick · SEO · budget prompt · first choice
“Most Affordable Paid Option: Mangools ... Add Mangools (~$30/month) for keyword research if needed” Kimi K2 · SEO · budget prompt · alternative
“Mangools — very user-friendly, good for basic SEO” GPT-5.4 mini · SEO · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mangools, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mangools was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mangools, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mangools was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mangools. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Mangools and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zapier.com7
blog.hubspot.com6
onelittleweb.com6
selectsoftwarereviews.com6
trysight.ai6
g2.com5
rankauthority.com5
thestacc.com5
rankability.com4
rankbeyond.co4
Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Mangools came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mangools.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mangools takes 3% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mangools.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mangools takes 3% of first choices and Semrush takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best seo and content optimization platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“mangools”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 45 a month
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 11 of 78 in SEO
Segment leader
21%
Semrush
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mangools.com
314
subdomains included
Content
227
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
33 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 207 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2024-07-31 | SEO | |
| Case study | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-07-07 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2024-09-29 | SEO | |
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Ai search watcher guide blog
- 2026-09-01Focus keyword blog
- 2026-08-31Seo for doctors blog
- 2026-08-21What is serp analysis boost keyword research glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-20Seo for lawyers blog
- 2026-06-27Local seo guide blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mangools.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Mangools
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mangools; a claim can dispute any of them.
KWFinder 1
Follow Mangools
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mangools is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mangools is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Juicy SEO tools you will love
- For
- solopreneurs, freelance SEOs and marketers
- Price stated
- Mangools Basic $3770/ mo; Mangools Premium $5270/ mo; Mangools Agency $9770/ mo mangools.com
- Starting price
- 3770 mangools.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get started FREE; Create a FREE account; Try our FREE mini SEO tools: no sign-up required! mangools.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 mangools.com/plans-and-pricing
- Certifications
- SEO certificate
- Customers named
- Julia McCoyGael BretonBrian Dean
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Mangools's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mangools.com, mangools.com/plans-and-pricing, mangools.com/kwfinder/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mangools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mangools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mangools by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mangools is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mangools, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.