AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › SEO › Clearscope vs SE Ranking
SEO and content optimization platforms · October 2026 Edition

Clearscope vs SE Ranking

Two of fourteen models named Clearscope first on the direct prompt; zero named SE Ranking. Both were named by all fourteen models and Clearscope carries 48 labels and SE Ranking 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Clearscope

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

SE Ranking

accepted challenger

United States, founded 2012. Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share14%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4824A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Clearscope reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Semrush was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Semrush vs Clearscope · Semrush vs SE Ranking · Surfer SEO vs Clearscope

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ClearscopeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSE Ranking
Direct20
Paraphrase601 against Clearscope
Comparative00
Budget-constrained062 against Clearscope · 1 against SE Ranking
Scale-constrained001 against Clearscope
Negative004 against Clearscope
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Clearscope and SE Ranking were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 131 answers naming Clearscope and the 102 naming SE Ranking. In those answers SE Ranking took the first choice six times and Clearscope zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Clearscope and SE Ranking stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Clearscope SE Ranking first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Clearscope on the left and SE Ranking on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Clearscope and SE Ranking stood in it.

Clearscope first, SE Ranking not the choice

2 of 14 modelsSE Ranking was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashClearscope, Semrush alternatives: Ahrefs, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
Kimi K2Clearscope alternatives: Frase, Semrush, Surfer SEO

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniConductor alternatives: Clearscope, Semrush
Grok 4.20Semrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, MarketMuse, SE Ranking, Surfer SEO
Mistral SmallAhrefs, Semrush alternatives: Clearscope, Google Keyword Planner, Google Search Console, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Screaming Frog SEO Spider, Surfer SEO
DeepSeek V4 FlashSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, SE Ranking, Surfer SEO
GLM 4.7 FlashXSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Surfer SEO
MiniMax M2.5Semrush alternatives: Conductor, SE Ranking, Sight AI
Muse Glimmer 30BSurfer SEO alternatives: Clearscope, MarketMuse

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Semrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Moz, Surfer SEO, Writesonic
Perplexity SonarSemrush alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
Llama 4 MaverickSight AI
Qwen 3.7 FlashSemrush alternatives: Sight AI, Surfer SEO
GPT-6 LunaSemrush alternatives: Conductor

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SE Ranking leads by fifteen points.
SE Ranking18%#2 of 11
Clearscope3%#8 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Clearscope leads at mid-market.
Clearscope14%#3 of 12
SE Ranking10%#4 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Clearscope leads by eleven points.
Clearscope11%#4 of 11
SE Ranking0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Clearscope

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“tools such as Surfer, Clearscope, or similar editors | Their term suggestions and scores can help with coverage, but they're recommendations—not proof” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Content Optimization Suites (Frase, Surfer, Clearscope) ... Use these to check your word count limits, not as a writing template.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“bloated enterprise platforms like Semrush, Ahrefs, or Clearscope, which easily run $100 to over $150 per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Clearscope: An enterprise content optimization platform that uses AI to grade content for topical depth and comprehensiveness” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend considering Clearscope or Scalenut as your SEO content optimization tool.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the pairing of Semrush and Clearscope remains the most reliable, high-performing combination” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about SE Ranking

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“those can cost considerably more. For example, SE Ranking’s Core plan is listed at $103.20/month with annual billing” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“For an all-in-one budget platform: Ubersuggest ($12–29/mo) or SE Ranking ($44/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Highly recommended for small businesses due to its affordability and comprehensive features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.