SE Ranking vs Ubersuggest
Zero of fourteen models named SE Ranking first on the direct prompt; zero named Ubersuggest. SE Ranking was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Ubersuggest by seven and SE Ranking carries 24 labels and Ubersuggest 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
United States, founded 2012. Named in five categories this edition.
By Neil Patel. Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.
By framing
SE RankingFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUbersuggest
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, SE Ranking and Ubersuggest were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 102 answers naming SE Ranking and the 54 naming Ubersuggest. In those answers Ubersuggest took the first choice five times and SE Ranking ten.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
SE Ranking Ubersuggest first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SE Ranking on the left and Ubersuggest on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
SE Ranking18%#2 of 11Ubersuggest11%#4 of 11SE Ranking10%#4 of 12Ubersuggest7%#6 of 12SE Ranking0%#– of 11Ubersuggest0%#– of 11What the models said about SE Ranking
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“those can cost considerably more. For example, SE Ranking’s Core plan is listed at $103.20/month with annual billing” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“For an all-in-one budget platform: Ubersuggest ($12–29/mo) or SE Ranking ($44/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Highly recommended for small businesses due to its affordability and comprehensive features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Ubersuggest
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“listed by one reviewer among tools they do not recommend” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Budget tool with persistent accuracy/quality gripes; fine for basics, but don't rely on it solo.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ubersuggest's data accuracy ... lags behind premium tools like Ahrefs and Semrush by 20–40%” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ubersuggest – Best Overall Budget Choice ... Why It Wins: Lowest starting price in the category” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Ubersuggest ($20/month) or Ranktracker (free tier)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Ubersuggest — Best Overall Budget Option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.