Seven of twelve models named Semrush first on the direct prompt; zero named Ubersuggest. Semrush was named by twelve of the twelve models and Ubersuggest by nine and Semrush carries 43 labels and Ubersuggest 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Boston, United States, founded 2008. Named in seven categories this edition.
By Neil Patel. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“SEO Tools to Avoid or Use with Caution | Semrush | 40/100 (High) | 3 documented complaints; recurring billing issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise tools (Ahrefs/Semrush $99–$139); overkill for small budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Semrush ($140+/mo) — great but overkill for most small budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Semrush is the strongest all-in-one SEO platform for keyword research, site audits, rank tracking, competitive analysis, PPC, and content marketing workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Ahrefs or Semrush if you need a baseline tool for overall website health, backlink tracking, and competitor espionage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want one platform only, Semrush is often the best balance of capability, breadth, and cost for mid-market teams.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Ubersuggest | 42/100 (High) | Persistent quality complaints; often criticized for outdated features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Persistent data quality complaints ... Don't make strategic decisions based on its data alone.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Persistent quality complaints; data accuracy issues | Moderate” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I’d pick Ubersuggest for most budget-conscious companies because it gives the broadest useful feature set at a relatively low entry price” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Ubersuggest stands out as the top overall pick for most small businesses needing both SEO and content optimization under $30/month” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation: Start with Ubersuggest ($29/month) if you need keyword research and competitor analysis” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.