Three of twelve models named Surfer SEO first on the direct prompt; zero named Ubersuggest. Surfer SEO was named by twelve of the twelve models and Ubersuggest by nine and Surfer SEO carries 56 labels and Ubersuggest 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
By Neil Patel. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Surfer SEO — entry plan is $49/mo, but AI tracking requires pricier tiers; more expensive than Frase” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Content optimization platforms like Surfer SEO, Clearscope, Frase, or Rankability... they are highly dangerous when misused” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“premium content editors (like Clearscope or Surfer SEO) often start around $100 to $140+ per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Ahrefs + Surfer SEO provides the best balance of comprehensive research capabilities and content optimization at $298/month” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Surfer SEO ... Surfer is widely considered the market leader for real-time content optimization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Surfer SEO if you want the most mature real-time optimization experience and produce content at volume” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Ubersuggest | 42/100 (High) | Persistent quality complaints; often criticized for outdated features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Persistent data quality complaints ... Don't make strategic decisions based on its data alone.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Persistent quality complaints; data accuracy issues | Moderate” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I’d pick Ubersuggest for most budget-conscious companies because it gives the broadest useful feature set at a relatively low entry price” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Ubersuggest stands out as the top overall pick for most small businesses needing both SEO and content optimization under $30/month” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation: Start with Ubersuggest ($29/month) if you need keyword research and competitor analysis” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.