GTM AI Index
Index Marketing SEO › Semrush vs SE Ranking
SEO and content optimization platforms · September 2026 Edition

Semrush vs SE Ranking

Seven of twelve models named Semrush first on the direct prompt; zero named SE Ranking. Semrush was named by twelve of the twelve models and SE Ranking by eleven and Semrush carries 43 labels and SE Ranking 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Semrush

accepted challenger

Boston, United States, founded 2008. Named in seven categories this edition.

SE Ranking

accepted challenger

United States, founded 2012. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share20%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate23%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels4324A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Semrush reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Surfer SEO was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Surfer SEO vs Semrush · Surfer SEO vs SE Ranking · Semrush vs Ubersuggest

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SemrushFirst choices, of twelve modelsSE Ranking
Direct70
Paraphrase20
Comparative70
Budget-constrained034 against Semrush · 1 against SE Ranking
Scale-constrained101 against Semrush
Negative105 against Semrush · 1 against SE Ranking
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Semrush and SE Ranking were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 206 answers naming Semrush and the 100 naming SE Ranking. In those answers SE Ranking took the first choice nine times and Semrush twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Semrush and SE Ranking stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Semrush SE Ranking first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Semrush on the left and SE Ranking on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Semrush and SE Ranking stood in it.

Semrush first, SE Ranking an alternative

7 of 12 modelsSE Ranking was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Conductor
Gemini 3.5 FlashSemrush, Surfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, SE Ranking
Perplexity SonarSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Surfer SEO
DeepSeek V4 FlashSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
Qwen 3.7 FlashAhrefs, Semrush alternatives: Clearscope, HubSpot, SE Ranking, Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, Surfer SEO
Kimi K2Semrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Screaming Frog, Surfer SEO
GLM 4.7 FlashXSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, NeuronWriter, Surfer SEO

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastSurfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Frase, MarketMuse, Semrush
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub, HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush, Surfer SEO
Llama 4 MaverickKeygrip alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Screaming Frog, Semrush, Surfer SEO

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sight AI alternatives: Intero Digital, Stratabeat, Ubersuggest, Virayo, Writesonic
MiniMax M2.5Surfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, MarketMuse

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Semrush leads by eight points.
Semrush21%#2 of 13
SE Ranking13%#4 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Semrush leads by fourteen points.
Semrush20%#2 of 16
SE Ranking6%#5 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Semrush leads by twelve points.
Semrush12%#3 of 13
SE Ranking0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Semrush

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“SEO Tools to Avoid or Use with Caution | Semrush | 40/100 (High) | 3 documented complaints; recurring billing issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise tools (Ahrefs/Semrush $99–$139); overkill for small budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Semrush ($140+/mo) — great but overkill for most small budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Semrush is the strongest all-in-one SEO platform for keyword research, site audits, rank tracking, competitive analysis, PPC, and content marketing workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Ahrefs or Semrush if you need a baseline tool for overall website health, backlink tracking, and competitor espionage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want one platform only, Semrush is often the best balance of capability, breadth, and cost for mid-market teams.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about SE Ranking

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“SE Ranking is solid for agencies and cost-conscious teams, but may fall short for enterprises needing deeper backlink analysis or more advanced SEM integration” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“SE Ranking jumped significantly (now ~$103+/mo)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best SEO and content optimization platform for a company with a limited budget is SE Ranking, which costs $55/month” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“or SE Ranking ($44/month) if you want a complete SEO platform including content optimization features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.