Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 48 → 6 of 92
1 category · Named, not rankedGeoptie
11Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Geoptie was named 4 times in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 94
4%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market37 of 90
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise63 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Geoptie for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 90 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Geoptie held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 36 of 85
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 58 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 37 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Geoptie across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Geoptie across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Geoptie at $49/month provides excellent value with its content studio and free audit tools” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI visibility · budget prompt · alternative
“Strong choices for mid-sized teams that need white-label reporting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · scale prompt · alternative
“Geoptie — brand workspaces with white-label reporting” Kimi K2 · AI visibility · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid pricier ones like Profound ($99+) or Geoptie ($49+) unless scaling.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Geoptie, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Geoptie was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Geoptie, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Geoptie was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Geoptie. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Geoptie and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
geoptie.comYour site11
blog.hubspot.com7
hubspot.com6
airops.com5
zapier.com5
reddit.com4
youtube.com4
amicited.com3
business.com3
conductor.com3
Forty of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Geoptie came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on geoptie.com
108
subdomains included
Content
43
counted in the table below
Documentation
45
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 30 | 4 | 2026-09-18 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 11 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | SEO | |
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Best promptwatch alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-18Rankscale ai review blog
- 2026-09-18Athenahq review blog
- 2026-08-02Promptwatch review blog
- 2026-07-24Otterly ai review blog
- 2026-06-29Scrunch ai review blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page geoptie.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Geoptie
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Geoptie is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Geoptie is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) platform that helps brands gain visibility in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, optimize content for AI citations, and grow in generative search.
- For
- brands
- Price stated
- USD 49-399 geoptie.com
- Starting price
- 49 geoptie.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try Free geoptie.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Geoptie's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: geoptie.com, geoptie.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Geoptie's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Geoptie, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Geoptie by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Geoptie is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Geoptie, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.