Dealfront vs RB2B
Zero of twelve models named Dealfront first on the direct prompt; zero named RB2B. Dealfront was named by eleven of the twelve models and RB2B by seven and Dealfront carries 37 labels and RB2B 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the B2B intent data providers page.
By framing
DealfrontFirst choices, of twelve modelsRB2B
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Dealfront and RB2B were named in the same answer thirty-six times, of the 134 answers naming Dealfront and the 71 naming RB2B. In those answers RB2B took the first choice four times and Dealfront four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Dealfront RB2B first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Dealfront on the left and RB2B on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Dealfront13%#2 of 14RB2B2%#8 of 14Dealfront2%#6 of 14RB2B2%#8 of 14Dealfront0%#– of 9RB2B0%#– of 9What the models said about Dealfront
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“favor scalable mid-market fits like Bombora or Dealfront” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for SMBs and mid-market teams with established website traffic wanting affordable visitor identification.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
“If you need a simpler solution focused just on website visitor identification, Dealfront is excellent.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about RB2B
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Go with RB2B if you want a low-cost, high-impact tool to turn anonymous US website traffic into LinkedIn outbound.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lightweight tools (like Warmly, RB2B, or Koala) are often much more digestible ($10k-$30k/year) for mid-market teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.