Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 4 of 63
5 categories · RankedRB2B
97Judge labels
14First choices
1Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Intent data for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of RB2B →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 68
4%27 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 60
5%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise26 of 46
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RB2B for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 5% | 6 of 60 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 12 of 140 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 13 of 71 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 28 of 56 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% | |
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 68 of 71 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RB2B held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Intent data · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 58
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 25 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 12 of 140 |
| Intent data | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 6 of 60 |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 13 of 71 |
| Session replay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 56, unchanged |
| Experimentation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RB2B across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RB2B across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels4
Paraphrase22 labels4
Comparative10 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained28 labels5
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative97 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“RB2B is particularly well-suited for early-stage B2B SaaS or services companies with US-only focus, sales-driven activation, and budget constraints, offering a free tier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Identity · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend RB2B if you have meaningful website traffic and want person-level identification” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have zero budget but some website traffic: Set up RB2B (for US traffic)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice
“the practical stack is usually Apollo.io or RB2B for coverage” Muse Glimmer 30B · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“don't provide genuine A/B testing or optimization functionality” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RB2B, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RB2B was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RB2B, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RB2B was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RB2B. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 95 of the 97 answers that named RB2B and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
demandbase.com44
rb2b.comYour site40
pipeline.zoominfo.com39
prospeo.io34
zenabm.com31
lusha.com27
warmly.ai25
factors.ai22
saleshandy.com22
cleverly.co21
265 of the 305 domain citations in answers naming RB2B came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
rb2b.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RB2B takes 5% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
rb2b.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RB2B takes 5% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“rb2b”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 43 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,372 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 720 · 106 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,477
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 60 in intent data
Segment leader
27%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 14 across its categories
- Named in
- 97 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 95 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on rb2b.com
539
subdomains included
Content
215
counted in the table below
Documentation
239
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 145 | 0 | 2026-03-09 | CRM, ABM | |
| Comparison | 52 | undated | |||
| Blog | 12 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2026-02-10 | CRM | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-05-188975716 registration checklist for new users template or tool
- 2026-03-09What is a consent management tool glossary or explainer
- 2026-02-10Using salesforce crm with rb2b report or ebook
- 2026-02-09Use slack for real time visitor alerts report or ebook
- 2026-02-09Filter slack notifications to reduce noise report or ebook
- 2026-02-09Collaborate and respond to slack alerts effectively report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page rb2b.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as RB2B
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RB2B; a claim can dispute any of them.
RB2B Pro 1RB2B/Leadfeeder 1
Follow RB2B
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
RB2B is its own company.ShowHide
The company
RB2B is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- website visitor identification software
- For
- null
- Price stated
- Paid plans start at $149/month. Starter plan for $79/mo for Person-Level ID, total 300 monthly resolutions. rb2b.com
- Starting price
- 79 rb2b.com
- Free plan or trial
- a 7-day full-featured trial rb2b.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 rb2b.com
- Certifications
- SOC2 Type II certifiedSOC2 Type II compliantSOC2 Type 2 CertifiedCCPA Compliant
- Hosting
- USGlobal
- Customers named
- MixmaxReplyDistribute.soSendsparkDefaultBiscredSASColdIQ
What RB2B's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: rb2b.com, rb2b.com/pricing, rb2b.com/security, rb2b.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RB2B's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RB2B, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RB2B by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RB2B is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RB2B, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.