Warmly

Named in 5 judge labels across 1 category by 2 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 2 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

8% in Intent data

Rank 4 of 40 products named in b2b intent data providers. 1 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Warmly. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B intent data providers	Sales	8%	4 of 40	0%	5	under 10 labels

By model

How each model treated Warmly across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	2	2	4
Claude Opus 4.8	0	0	0
GPT-6 Astra	0	0	0
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	0	0
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	0	0

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Deploy Factors.ai or Warmly (~$10–20K) for 90 days. Website de-anonymization is your highest-precision signal” Claude Opus 5 · Intent data · direct prompt · first choice

“RB2B or Warmly for first-party + Clay for signal enrichment, total under ~$1k/month” Claude Opus 5 · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose RB2B, Warmly, or Lift AI if you want to aggressively capture and convert the anonymous traffic” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Intent data · comparative prompt · alternative

“First-party visitor identification, real-time | ~$10K–$20K” Claude Opus 5 · Intent data · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as Warmly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Warmly; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Warmly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.