GTM AI Index
Index Vendors RB2B › Alternatives · September 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to RB2B, as AI models named them

In the September 2026 Edition, 392 of the 432 answers collected in the two categories where RB2B holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 392 answers that did not name RB2B, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

B2B intent data providers

Sales. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when RB2B is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessRB2B is #8 of 14 here at 2% of first choices, 18 labels.

Fifty-nine of the seventy-two answers did not name RB2B; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those fifty-nine answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

6 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketRB2B is #8 of 14 here at 2% of first choices, 13 labels.

Sixty-four of the seventy-two answers did not name RB2B; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those sixty-four answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

6 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseRB2B holds 1 label here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name RB2B; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

3 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Identity resolution

GTM data and infrastructure. Six framings, twelve models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when RB2B is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessRB2B is #3 of 15 here at 10% of first choices, 11 labels.

Sixty-one of the seventy-two answers did not name RB2B; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those sixty-one answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

11 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketRB2B is #11 of 18 here at 0% of first choices, 10 labels.

Sixty-four of the seventy-two answers did not name RB2B; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those sixty-four answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

LiveRamp12 of 64
Hightouch8 of 64
Tealium5 of 64
Segment3 of 64
Amperity2 of 64
Apollo.io2 of 64
11 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseRB2B holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-two of the seventy-two answers did not name RB2B; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-two answers, twenty-nine products in all, the eight most named:

21 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of twelve models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is seventy-two answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled RB2B neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named RB2B only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from RB2B's side.

Every answer and every label is in the free record. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of RB2B was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.