Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 7 of 63
1 category · RankedLead Onion
29Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Intent data for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 60 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 68
2%25 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market24 of 60
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lead Onion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 24 of 60 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lead Onion held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Intent data · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 → 31 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 24 of 60 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lead Onion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lead Onion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“| Lead Onion | Custom (affordable subscription) | Aggregates 24 third-party sources |” Grok 4.1 Fast · Intent data · budget prompt · alternative
“Best Multi-Source Intent on a Budget” Kimi K2 · Intent data · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“filtering tools don't always work as expected, and industry classifications aren't always accurate or up to date” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Intent data · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lead Onion, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lead Onion was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lead Onion, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lead Onion was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lead Onion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Lead Onion and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
demandbase.com29
rb2b.com24
saleshandy.com21
warmly.ai16
delveant.com15
pipeline.zoominfo.com12
cleverly.co11
apollo.io10
percepture.com10
spanglobalservices.com10
158 of the 158 domain citations in answers naming Lead Onion came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leadonion.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lead Onion takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leadonion.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lead Onion takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“lead onion”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 59 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 32 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 271
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 60 in intent data
Segment leader
27%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leadonion.ai
231
subdomains included
Content
163
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 159 | 0 | 2026-02-17 | ABM | |
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-02-17How to spot wandering eyes and intercept churn 60 days before cancellation blog
- 2026-02-03Introducing our latest account intelligence features blog
- 2026-01-06The 3 vague signals that prove your intent data is junk blog
- 2025-12-16Is your intent data a black box blog
- 2025-12-03Make the switch to multi signal intent data blog
- 2025-11-19From intent to iqls how to predict and engage buyers faster blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leadonion.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Lead Onion
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lead Onion is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lead Onion is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI-Powered GTM Intelligence Platform
- For
- GTM teams
- Price stated
- Lead Onion Growth $2,000 Per Month. Starter $500 / month. Growth $1,750 / month. Scale $3,000 / month. Enterprise POA / month. Optional Extras: Contact Reveals: 1000 = $200/month; Intent Triggers: 10 = $100/month; Website Lookups: 5,000 = $50/month; Extra Users: 1 =$50/month. leadonion.ai/pricing
- Starting price
- 500 leadonion.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- No Credit Card Needed leadonion.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 10000 leadonion.ai · 5 leadonion.ai/pricing pages disagree
- Customers named
- The Pilot GroupGrabyoSecureAuth
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Lead Onion's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: leadonion.ai, leadonion.ai/pricing, leadonion.ai/case-studies, leadonion.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lead Onion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lead Onion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lead Onion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lead Onion is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lead Onion, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.