| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 4% | 8 of 60 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 2% | 8 of 66 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 28 of 116 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 0% | 65 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 46 of 65 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 8 of 60 |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 66, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 116, unchanged |
| AI SDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 65 of 77 |
| Email verification | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 35 → 46 of 65 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Saleshandy is the cheapest entry point on this list at $25/month, making it ideal for teams focused on high-volume email outreach on a tight budget.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · first choice
“The best B2B intent data provider for a company with a limited budget is likely to be one of the following: 1. Saleshandy” Llama 4 Maverick · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Saleshandy or Apollo.io as they offer the best value” MiniMax M2.5 · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice
“Saleshandy: Offers a starter plan starting at $34/month, with unlimited email accounts and 100 free AI credits on signup.” Llama 4 Maverick · Value selling · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 42 answers that named Saleshandy and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-six of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Saleshandy came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 516 | 5 | 2026-09-27 | CRM, Enrichment | |
| Comparison | 112 | 5 | 2026-09-27 | Enrichment, CRM | |
| Case study | 15 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 5 | 2026-09-14 | CRM | |
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page saleshandy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Saleshandy's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: saleshandy.com, saleshandy.com/pricing, trust.saleshandy.com, saleshandy.com/use-cases/link-building, saleshandy.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Saleshandy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Saleshandy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Saleshandy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: