Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 71
4 categories · RankedAbmatic AI
47Judge labels
9First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in ABM for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 74
4%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market9 of 71
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 46
8%14 labels
accepted challenger
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Abmatic AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 9 of 71 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 18 of 71 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Native and content advertising | Marketing | 0% | 28 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 50 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Abmatic AI held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ABM · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 20 → 8 of 64
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 of 44, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native ads | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 28 of 86 |
| ABM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 9 of 71 |
| Experimentation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 18 of 71 |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 76, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Abmatic AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Abmatic AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels5
Scale-constrained6 labels2
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Abmatic AI - Best for Series A to C SaaS companies, revenue teams of 10 to 100 people, and 500 to 5,000 target accounts.” Llama 4 Maverick · ABM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“they are not true experimentation platforms... you'd still pair them with a Convert or VWO for testing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · alternative
“Other options include Abmatic AI, which is a comprehensive AI-native platform with 15+ native capabilities” Llama 4 Maverick · Native ads · direct prompt · alternative
“best for mid-market and enterprise teams that want ABM without assembling a stack” Llama 4 Maverick · ABM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Abmatic AI (~$36K/year) — collapses multiple tools into one platform” Kimi K2 · ABM · budget prompt · soft negative
“higher pricing that may be less aligned with a typical mid-market buyer” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Abmatic AI, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Abmatic AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Abmatic AI, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Abmatic AI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Abmatic AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named Abmatic AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
abmatic.aiYour site47
prospeo.io21
pipeline.zoominfo.com19
blog.hubspot.com15
tomba.io15
lusha.com14
cleverly.co13
zenabm.com13
guideflow.com12
demandbase.com10
132 of the 179 domain citations in answers naming Abmatic AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
abmatic.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Abmatic AI takes 2% of first choices and AdRoll ABM takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
abmatic.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Abmatic AI takes 2% of first choices and AdRoll ABM takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “account-based marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best account-based marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“abmatic ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 872 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,558 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,380
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 71 in ABM
Segment leader
53%
AdRoll ABM
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 47 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 47 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on abmatic.ai
11,408
subdomains included
Content
11,252
counted in the table below
Documentation
110
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 8,734 | 15 | 2026-09-18 | ABM, SEO | |
| Comparison | 1,564 | 13 | 2026-09-18 | ABM, Enrichment | |
| Glossary or explainer | 686 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | ABM, CDP | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 75 | 0 | 2026-05-12 | ABM | |
| Conference or event | 64 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | ABM | |
| Case study | 53 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ABM, Mobile apps | |
| Template or tool | 39 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ABM | |
| Podcast or video | 29 | 0 | 2023-03-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-04-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Cdp marketing blog
- 2026-09-18Clearbit vs crunchbase comparison
- 2026-09-18Competitor segmentation blog
- 2026-09-18Firmographic data providers accuracy blog
- 2026-09-18Keyplay pricing blog
- 2026-09-18Manual vs automated product data enrichment comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page abmatic.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Abmatic AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Abmatic AI is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Abmatic AI is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- One AI platform. Your whole ABM stack.
- For
- mid-market and enterprise B2B
- Price stated
- Freeforever · no card; $3,000/mo · billed annually; $4,000/mo · billed annually abmatic.ai/pricing
- Starting price
- Freeforever abmatic.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day pilot abmatic.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR & CCPA compliantSOC 2 Type ISOC 2 Type II (in-progress)SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- KetchQuantum MetricTiltOcus
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Abmatic AI's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: abmatic.ai, abmatic.ai/pricing, trust.abmatic.ai, abmatic.ai/platform, abmatic.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Abmatic AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Abmatic AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Abmatic AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Abmatic AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Abmatic AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.