| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native and content advertising | Marketing | 2% | 12 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 23% |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 16 of 151 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 15% |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 76 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56% |
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 21 of 69 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34% |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 30 of 62 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35% |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 76 of 104 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best native advertising platform for a mid-market B2B company is Abmatic AI” Llama 4 Maverick · Native ads · direct prompt · first choice
“Primary Recommendation: Abmatic AI” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Identity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Abmatic AI is a mid-market and enterprise ABM platform that covers all 14 core account-based marketing capabilities in one product” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · direct prompt · alternative
“Offers a comprehensive AI-native platform with multiple capabilities, suitable for mid-market and enterprise B2B teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Intent data · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Abmatic AI claims to replace LeanData + Chili Piper + Outreach in one $36K+/yr tool). Only consider consolidation if it genuinely serves your lead lifecycle” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · scale prompt · soft negative
“are comfortable evaluating a newer vendor rather than a more established mid-market default” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 34 answers that named Abmatic AI and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-four of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming Abmatic AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Abmatic AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Abmatic AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at abmatic.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.