GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Abmatic AI · September 2026 Edition
6 categories · Ranked

Abmatic AI

34Judge labels
11First choices
3Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
6Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Native ads for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 72 in the mid-market standing
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In native ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Abmatic AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Native and content advertisingMarketing2%12 of 720%1under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 23%
Identity resolutionGTM data and infrastructure2%16 of 1510%1under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 15%
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%23 of 7620%5under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing0%21 of 690%3under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34%
B2B intent data providersSales0%30 of 620%1under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35%
Lead routing and managementSales0%76 of 104100%1under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Abmatic AI yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Abmatic AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick12003
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels2
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels6
Scale-constrained4 labels2
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best native advertising platform for a mid-market B2B company is Abmatic AI” Llama 4 Maverick · Native ads · direct prompt · first choice
“Primary Recommendation: Abmatic AI” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Identity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Abmatic AI is a mid-market and enterprise ABM platform that covers all 14 core account-based marketing capabilities in one product” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · direct prompt · alternative
“Offers a comprehensive AI-native platform with multiple capabilities, suitable for mid-market and enterprise B2B teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · Intent data · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Abmatic AI claims to replace LeanData + Chili Piper + Outreach in one $36K+/yr tool). Only consider consolidation if it genuinely serves your lead lifecycle” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · scale prompt · soft negative
“are comfortable evaluating a newer vendor rather than a more established mid-market default” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Abmatic AI, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Abmatic AI was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Demandbase25 of 341Not in the top three
6sense19 of 341Not in the top three
AdRoll ABM17 of 346Not in the top three
HubSpot ABM13 of 344Not in the top three
Terminus8 of 340Not in the top three
Bombora6 of 341Not in the top three
ZoomInfo6 of 340Not in the top three
Mutiny5 of 341Not in the top three
Dealfront4 of 341Not in the top three
VWO4 of 341Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Abmatic AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 34 answers that named Abmatic AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

abmatic.aiYour site7
demandbase.com5
factors.ai4
gartner.com4
guideflow.com4
pipeline.zoominfo.com4
salesmotion.io4
cleverly.co3
marketbetter.ai3
nrich.io3

Thirty-four of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming Abmatic AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Abmatic AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Abmatic AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at abmatic.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack