| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 27% | 1 of 71 | 11% | 56 | accepted challenger | ▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 36 of 56 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimentation | 34% | 26% | ▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 71, unchanged |
| Session replay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 56, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Great mid-market option. Very strong visual editor... Highly competitive pricing. (If Marketing: prioritize VWO/Kameleoon.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · first choice
“the most commonly recommended A/B testing and personalization tools are Convert Experiences and VWO” Mistral Small · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose VWO if you want the best bang-for-your-buck and need analytics (heatmaps) along with your testing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with VWO if you need balanced experimentation and personalization at a mid-market price.” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Any visual-editor-first platform—including products from vendors such as VWO, AB Tasty, or Optimizely—if your site is a complex single-page app” GPT-6 Luna · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative
“VWO has phased out its permanently free Starter plan, moving to a 30-day trial model with paid plans starting around $200 to $300+/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · budget prompt · soft negative
“Some users report pricing scalability issues - Occasional technical glitches - Learning curve for complex tests” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative
“often require custom quotes (starting at $50K+/year), criticized for overkill for small/mid-sized teams” Grok 4.20 · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 156 of the 167 answers that named VWO and are not a share of its labels.
524 of the 524 domain citations in answers naming VWO came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 340 | 2 | 2026-08-13 | Experimentation, SEO | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 283 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | SEO, Ecommerce marketing | |
| Report or ebook | 59 | 25 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 58 | 16 | 2026-10-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 50 | 22 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| News or press | 44 | 1 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 9 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | 1 | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Blog | 5 | 2 | 2026-09-14 | CDP | |
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2024-07-17 |
As the event pages on vwo.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page vwo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What VWO's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: vwo.com, trust.vwo.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VWO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VWO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for VWO by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend VWO first in Experimentation and personalization this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.