AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › VWO · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

VWO

167Judge labels
41First choices
30Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
36% in Experimentation for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
9 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 56 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of VWO →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named VWO for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing27%1 of 7111%56accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Session replay and heatmapsGTM data and infrastructure0%36 of 560%2under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%

Movement

Since September 2026, VWO held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Experimentation · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 38% → 37%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
37%from 38% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 1 of 63, unchanged
Mid-market▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
26%from 34% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 68, unchanged
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 12% → 6%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 → 4 of 53

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Experimentation34%26%▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 1 of 71, unchanged
Session replay0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 36 of 56, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated VWO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520103
GPT-5.4 mini12104
Gemini 3.5 Flash22116
Perplexity Sonar12003
Grok 4.2022116
Mistral Small11103
DeepSeek V4 Flash05106
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash11204
Kimi K213105
GLM 4.7 FlashX11125
MiniMax M2.514005
GPT-6 Luna20125
Muse Glimmer 30B12003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels17
Paraphrase31 labels12
Comparative32 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained25 labels3
Scale-constrained23 labels9
Negative25 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative167 labels in all, every segment counted; 41 of the 50 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Great mid-market option. Very strong visual editor... Highly competitive pricing. (If Marketing: prioritize VWO/Kameleoon.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · first choice
“the most commonly recommended A/B testing and personalization tools are Convert Experiences and VWO” Mistral Small · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose VWO if you want the best bang-for-your-buck and need analytics (heatmaps) along with your testing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with VWO if you need balanced experimentation and personalization at a mid-market price.” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Any visual-editor-first platform—including products from vendors such as VWO, AB Tasty, or Optimizely—if your site is a complex single-page app” GPT-6 Luna · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative
“VWO has phased out its permanently free Starter plan, moving to a 30-day trial model with paid plans starting around $200 to $300+/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · budget prompt · soft negative
“Some users report pricing scalability issues - Occasional technical glitches - Learning curve for complex tests” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative
“often require custom quotes (starting at $50K+/year), criticized for overkill for small/mid-sized teams” Grok 4.20 · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as VWO, over the 167 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VWO was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Adobe Target87 of 1677Not among the top eight
AB Tasty79 of 1671Not among the top eight
Dynamic Yield45 of 1670Not among the top eight
Statsig39 of 1674Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VWO. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 156 of the 167 answers that named VWO and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

convert.com71
mida.so65
contentsquare.com61
webflow.com56
kameleoon.com55
guideflow.com48
optimizely.com46
growthbook.io44
personyze.com40
abmatic.ai38

524 of the 524 domain citations in answers naming VWO came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where VWO stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “website experimentation and personalization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best website experimentation and personalization platform”
5
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“vwo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
449 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 25,874 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,818 · 292 in the top three
Sites linking to it
18,849
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
68 ads · 40 text, 18 image, 10 video · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2023, as Wingify Software Private Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 20 in the year, 48 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
27%
rank 1 of 71 in experimentation
First choices
41
across its categories
Named in
167 answers
Its own site cited
in 156 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on vwo.com
1,712
subdomains included
Content
861
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
14 · 59
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Case study34022026-08-13Experimentation, SEO
Webinar or virtual event28332026-09-22SEO, Ecommerce marketing
Report or ebook59252026-09-23
Conference or event58162026-10-15
Podcast or video50222026-09-02
News or press4412026-09-16
Comparison1192026-09-16
Template or tool1012026-07-16
Blog522026-09-14CDP
Glossary or explainer102024-07-17

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on vwo.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page vwo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as VWO

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as VWO; a claim can dispute any of them.
VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) 18VWO Pro 1

Follow VWO

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

VWO is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered platform for Digital Experience Optimization
For
Growth teams, Marketing teams, Product teams, Digital and ecommerce teams
Free plan or trial
30-day free trial with no credit card vwo.com
Certifications
ISO 27001 ISMSISO 27701 PIMSISO 27017 Cloud securityISO 27018 Cloud PrivacyPCI DSS v4.0.1SOC 2 Type II
Hosting
USEUIndia
Customers named
Samsonite
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations

What VWO's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: vwo.com, trust.vwo.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VWO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VWO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for VWO by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where VWO is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name VWO, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vwo.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where VWO is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend VWO first in Experimentation and personalization this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in Experimentation and personalization, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/experimentation-and-personalization/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/vwo--experimentation-and-personalization-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Experimentation and personalization, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Experimentation and personalization standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in Experimentation and personalization, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/experimentation-and-personalization/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/vwo--experimentation-and-personalization-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Experimentation and personalization, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Experimentation and personalization standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in Experimentation and personalization, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/experimentation-and-personalization/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/vwo--experimentation-and-personalization-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Experimentation and personalization, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Experimentation and personalization standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.