GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Mutiny · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Mutiny

90Judge labels
10First choices
23Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Experimentation for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 69 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 21 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mutiny for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing2%12 of 6929%21criticized challenger
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%20 of 7610%10accepted challenger
Sales enablement and contentSales0%34 of 810%3under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mutiny yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mutiny across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512003
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02035
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast01023
Mistral Small00213
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash02103
Kimi K203216
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.502103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels7
Paraphrase19 labels3
Comparative26 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Mutiny offers the best balance of ease of use, B2B-specific features, and reasonable pricing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice
“Mutiny is purpose-built for B2B... Pricing is enterprise-leaning ... which is often out of mid-market budgets.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · alternative
“Mutiny / Clearbit-integrated — specifically if your primary use case is B2B account-based personalization” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · alternative
“Mutiny is the category leader in dynamic content personalization and landing page A/B testing for B2B SaaS” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“previously a top choice for B2B website personalization—discontinued its website personalization platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“(legacy) - Was previously top for B2B ABM but pivoted in 2026 ... (Discontinued 2026)” Mistral Small · Experimentation · direct prompt · hard negative
“Mutiny (Avoid for On-Site Personalization)... Mutiny is no longer the tool for you.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Mutiny discontinued its legacy on-site website personalization SaaS platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mutiny, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mutiny was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
VWO51 of 9024Not in the top three
Optimizely CMS40 of 9010Not in the top three
Adobe Target29 of 900Not in the top three
Kameleoon22 of 902Not in the top three
Dynamic Yield21 of 901Not in the top three
Demandbase20 of 905Not in the top three
6sense20 of 904Not in the top three
Convert18 of 903Not in the top three
AdRoll ABM16 of 904Not in the top three
AB Tasty16 of 901Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mutiny. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 90 answers that named Mutiny and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com8
guideflow.com7
convert.com6
learn.g2.com6
qualaroo.com6
mida.so5
vwo.com5
abmatic.ai4
cxl.com4
growthmethod.com4

Fifty-five of the fifty-five domain citations in answers naming Mutiny came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mutiny's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mutiny, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mutinyhq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.