Every category where a model named Kameleoon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	4%	8 of 69	4%	27	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kameleoon yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kameleoon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	4	0	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	1	0	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative21 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained13 labels1

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd recommend Kameleoon because it offers the best combination of A/B testing and personalization capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) and Kameleoon are consistently rated as top choices for this segment in 2026” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

“Kameleoon (France) - GDPR compliant, no personal data collection” Mistral Small · Experimentation · negative prompt · first choice

“Kameleoon — strong for enterprise teams in regulated industries with GDPR tooling and server-side support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Too few independent buyer reviews to verify claims; developer-heavy approach may alienate marketers” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kameleoon, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kameleoon was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Optimizely CMS64 of 6824Not in the top three

VWO64 of 6814Not in the top three

Adobe Target51 of 681Not in the top three

AB Tasty39 of 680Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield35 of 680Not in the top three

Statsig32 of 681Not in the top three

GrowthBook29 of 683Not in the top three

LaunchDarkly23 of 680Not in the top three

Mutiny22 of 681Not in the top three

Convert19 of 683Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kameleoon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 68 answers that named Kameleoon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kameleoon.comYour site6

vwo.com6

convert.com4

growthbook.io4

guideflow.com4

mida.so4

abmatic.ai3

amplitude.com3

gartner.com3

learn.g2.com3

Thirty-four of the forty domain citations in answers naming Kameleoon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kameleoon.com/blog/best-ab-testing-tools5

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/ab-testing-tools-for-growth-teams3

gartner.com/reviews/market/a-b-testing-tools3

growthbook.io/insights/best-ai-experimentation-platforms3

guideflow.com/blog/ab-testing-tools3

learn.g2.com/best-a-b-testing-tools3

mida.so/blog/website-personalization-tools3

statsig.com/comparison/best-experimentation-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Q56318461 is the company behind Kameleoon.

Website: kameleoon.com
Headquarters: Paris, France
Founded: 2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kameleoon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kameleoon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kameleoon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.