Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 16 of 63
4 categories · RankedStatsig
77Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Experimentation for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Statsig →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 69
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market15 of 71
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 63
2%21 labels
accepted challenger
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Statsig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 15 of 71 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 32 of 142 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Product analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 10 of 40 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 26 of 56 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Statsig held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Experimentation · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 8 → 15 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 9 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimentation | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 15 of 71 |
| Product analytics | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 10 of 40 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 32 of 142 |
| Session replay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 56, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Statsig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Statsig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative30 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels1
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative15 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Statsig and LaunchDarkly are strong when experimentation is tied to feature delivery” Perplexity Sonar · Experimentation · comparative prompt · first choice
“delivers comprehensive product analytics alongside experimentation, feature flags, and session replay in one unified platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · Product analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
“such as OpenReplay, PostHog, or Statsig connected to your own Snowflake or BigQuery warehouse” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Session replay · negative prompt · alternative
“Statsig offers the lowest pricing for analytics events compared to Mixpanel, Amplitude, and PostHog” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer intel · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Statsig, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Statsig was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Statsig, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Statsig was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Statsig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 77 answers that named Statsig and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
statsig.comYour site53
amplitude.com28
growthbook.io25
guideflow.com25
kameleoon.com24
optimizely.com24
linkedin.com22
convert.com20
contentsquare.com19
checkthat.ai17
204 of the 257 domain citations in answers naming Statsig came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
statsig.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Statsig takes 0% of first choices and VWO takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
statsig.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Statsig takes 0% of first choices and VWO takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “website experimentation and personalization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best website experimentation and personalization platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“statsig”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 182 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 353,837 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 17,495 · 1,962 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,453
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $176 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 71 in experimentation
Segment leader
27%
VWO
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 77 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 74 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on statsig.com
1,451
subdomains included
Content
598
counted in the table below
Documentation
792
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 386 | 11 | 2026-09-23 | CDP | |
| Report or ebook | 72 | 0 | 2022-06-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 56 | undated | |||
| Case study | 33 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2025-06-10 | ||
| News or press | 14 | 0 | 2025-04-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2023-08-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2023-07-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-12-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Our take on ai for experimentation blog
- 2026-09-15Beyond the a b test blog version blog
- 2026-09-10Color commentary aug 26 blog
- 2026-08-31Z test on non normal distribution blog
- 2026-08-19Running faster tests part 2 blog
- 2026-08-11Pm roundtable prioritize experiments blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page statsig.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Statsig
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Statsig is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Statsig is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The modern product development platform
- For
- your team
- Price stated
- the industry's most generous free tier or scalable enterprise pricing statsig.com
- Starting price
- Free statsig.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- the industry's most generous free tier statsig.com
- Certifications
- Statsig UniversitySOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- EUUnited States
- Customers named
- OpenAIBrexAncestryNotionLimeWhatnotWizehireDoorDash
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Statsig's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: statsig.com, statsig.com/pricing, trust.statsig.com, statsig.com/features/metrics, statsig.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Statsig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Statsig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Statsig by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Statsig is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Statsig, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.