GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › AB Tasty · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

AB Tasty

80Judge labels
1First choices
22Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Experimentation for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 69 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 30 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AB Tasty for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing2%11 of 6917%30accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AB Tasty yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AB Tasty across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00112
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast02103
Mistral Small02204
DeepSeek V4 Flash01315
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative22 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Begin your shortlist with AB Tasty (for strong marketer adoption + personalization) or VWO” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · first choice
“Excellent for mid-market and scaling enterprise companies. It offers an intuitive visual editor, server-side testing, and AI-driven personalization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · alternative
“AB Tasty is a mid-market personalization platform that doesn't require weeks of onboarding” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Experimentation · direct prompt · alternative
“AB Tasty: Focuses heavily on privacy-first segmentation and mid-market scalability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Experimentation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid (Not Budget-Friendly) - AB Tasty: Typically $700-2,500/month” MiniMax M2.5 · Experimentation · budget prompt · hard negative
“pivoted hard into enterprise-tier custom pricing, making them inaccessible for companies with tight budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · budget prompt · soft negative
“it may be a better fit for teams that don’t need the deepest enterprise experimentation stack” GPT-5.4 mini · Experimentation · direct prompt · soft negative
“Extreme merger uncertainty ... AB Tasty (if merger stabilizes)” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AB Tasty, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AB Tasty was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
VWO73 of 8020Not in the top three
Optimizely CMS69 of 8019Not in the top three
Adobe Target55 of 802Not in the top three
Kameleoon39 of 802Not in the top three
GrowthBook37 of 805Not in the top three
Statsig36 of 802Not in the top three
Dynamic Yield35 of 801Not in the top three
Convert30 of 807Not in the top three
LaunchDarkly24 of 800Not in the top three
PostHog18 of 803Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AB Tasty. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 80 answers that named AB Tasty and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vwo.com9
growthbook.io5
convert.com4
kameleoon.com4
mida.so4
optimizely.com4
statsig.com4
amplitude.com3
abmatic.ai2
abtesting.cc2

Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming AB Tasty came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

AB Tasty.
Website
abtasty.com
Headquarters
Paris, France
Founded
2009
Employees
about 111 (2018)

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AB Tasty's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AB Tasty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at abtasty.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack