GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Convert Experiences · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Convert Experiences

28Judge labels
9First choices
0Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Experimentation for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 69 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Convert Experiences for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing8%4 of 690%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Convert Experiences yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Convert Experiences across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash12003
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase8 labels4
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best website experimentation and personalization platform for a mid-market B2B company is Convert Experiences” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice
“If you must pick just one to start: Go with Convert or VWO.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Convert Experiences ⭐ BEST OVERALL CHOICE” Mistral Small · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Convert Experiences” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Convert Experiences, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Convert Experiences was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
VWO27 of 285Not in the top three
Optimizely CMS21 of 283Not in the top three
Adobe Target13 of 281Not in the top three
AB Tasty12 of 280Not in the top three
Kameleoon12 of 280Not in the top three
GrowthBook10 of 282Not in the top three
PostHog9 of 281Not in the top three
Statsig9 of 280Not in the top three
Dynamic Yield7 of 280Not in the top three
Mutiny6 of 281Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Convert Experiences. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 28 answers that named Convert Experiences and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vwo.com2
abtasty.com1
convert.comYour site1
optimizely.com1

Four of the five domain citations in answers naming Convert Experiences came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Convert Experiences's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Convert Experiences, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at convert.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack