One of fourteen models named Convert Experiences first on the direct prompt; zero named Optimizely CMS. Both were named by all fourteen models and Convert Experiences carries 33 labels and Optimizely CMS 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By Optimizely, San Francisco, United States, founded 2010. Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the experimentation and personalization page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Convert Experiences and Optimizely CMS were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 86 answers naming Convert Experiences and the 258 naming Optimizely CMS. In those answers Optimizely CMS took the first choice ten times and Convert Experiences nineteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I would recommend Convert.com (Convert Experiences) as the A/B testing and personalization tool for a mid-sized B2B company.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Convert Experiences (also known as Convert.com) as the top A/B testing and personalization tool.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the most commonly recommended A/B testing and personalization tools are Convert Experiences and VWO” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“more enterprise-y, pricier ~$36K/yr min, dev-heavy). Avoid if mid-market budget/timeline constrained.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid at this size: Optimizely is enterprise and engineering-led... typically overkill” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Optimizely or Adobe Target—they typically start at $36k+/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd lean toward VWO or Optimizely depending on your budget... Optimizely provides more advanced personalization if you have the budget.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Leader in Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)... For Enterprise Organizations: Optimizely, Dynamic Yield, or Monetate offer comprehensive suites” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“The heavyweight, "do-everything" enterprise platform... Recognized as a Leader in the *Gartner Magic Quadrant for Personalization Engines*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.