AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Experimentation › Convert Experiences vs Optimizely CMS
Experimentation and personalization · October 2026 Edition

Convert Experiences vs Optimizely CMS

One of fourteen models named Convert Experiences first on the direct prompt; zero named Optimizely CMS. Both were named by all fourteen models and Convert Experiences carries 33 labels and Optimizely CMS 55, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Convert Experiences

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Optimizely CMS

criticized challenger

By Optimizely, San Francisco, United States, founded 2010. Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share24%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%47%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3355A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Convert Experiences reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.VWO was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. VWO vs Convert Experiences · VWO vs Optimizely CMS · Convert Experiences vs GrowthBook

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the experimentation and personalization page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Convert ExperiencesFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOptimizely CMS
Direct107 against Optimizely CMS
Paraphrase1015 against Optimizely CMS
Comparative07
Budget-constrained213 against Optimizely CMS
Scale-constrained021 against Optimizely CMS
Negative0010 against Optimizely CMS
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Convert Experiences and Optimizely CMS were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 86 answers naming Convert Experiences and the 258 naming Optimizely CMS. In those answers Optimizely CMS took the first choice ten times and Convert Experiences nineteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Convert Experiences and Optimizely CMS stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Convert Experiences Optimizely CMS first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Convert Experiences on the left and Optimizely CMS on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Convert Experiences and Optimizely CMS stood in it.

Convert Experiences first, Optimizely CMS not the choice

1 of 14 modelsOptimizely CMS was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
DeepSeek V4 FlashConvert Experiences, Mutiny alternatives: Abmatic AI, VWO

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20VWO alternatives: AB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Mutiny
Qwen 3.7 FlashVWO alternatives: AB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Mutiny
GPT-6 LunaVWO alternatives: Optimizely CMS

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5VWO alternatives: Mutiny
GPT-5.4 miniKameleoon alternatives: Optimizely Web Experimentation, VWO Testing
Gemini 3.5 FlashVWO alternatives: Abmatic AI, Croct, Ploy, PostHog
Perplexity SonarVWO alternatives: Personyze
Mistral SmallOptimizely Web Experimentation, Personyze alternatives: Kameleoon
Llama 4 MaverickOptimizely Web Experimentation alternatives: HubSpot, Kameleoon, Personyze
Kimi K2VWO alternatives: Intellimize, Mutiny, PostHog
GLM 4.7 FlashXMutiny alternatives: Abmatic AI, VWO
MiniMax M2.5Markettailor, VWO alternatives: AB Tasty, Mutiny
Muse Glimmer 30BMutiny, VWO alternatives: HubSpot, Kameleoon, Personyze

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Convert Experiences leads by thirteen points.
Convert Experiences13%#2 of 14
Optimizely CMS0%#14 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Convert Experiences leads by sixteen points.
Convert Experiences24%#2 of 12
Optimizely CMS7%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Optimizely CMS leads at enterprise.
Optimizely CMS46%#1 of 11
Convert Experiences3%#7 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Convert Experiences

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“I would recommend Convert.com (Convert Experiences) as the A/B testing and personalization tool for a mid-sized B2B company.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Convert Experiences (also known as Convert.com) as the top A/B testing and personalization tool.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the most commonly recommended A/B testing and personalization tools are Convert Experiences and VWO” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Optimizely CMS

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“more enterprise-y, pricier ~$36K/yr min, dev-heavy). Avoid if mid-market budget/timeline constrained.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid at this size: Optimizely is enterprise and engineering-led... typically overkill” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools like Optimizely or Adobe Target—they typically start at $36k+/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd lean toward VWO or Optimizely depending on your budget... Optimizely provides more advanced personalization if you have the budget.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Leader in Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)... For Enterprise Organizations: Optimizely, Dynamic Yield, or Monetate offer comprehensive suites” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“The heavyweight, "do-everything" enterprise platform... Recognized as a Leader in the *Gartner Magic Quadrant for Personalization Engines*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.