AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › LaunchDarkly · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

LaunchDarkly

25Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Experimentation for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LaunchDarkly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing0%16 of 710%8under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, LaunchDarkly held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Experimentation · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 81 → 34 of 63
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 16 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 49 of 53

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Experimentation0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 19 → 16 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated LaunchDarkly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Statsig and LaunchDarkly are strong when experimentation is tied to feature delivery” Perplexity Sonar · Experimentation · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose LaunchDarkly / Statsig / GrowthBook if: you're more product-engineering oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · Experimentation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Product-led growth | LaunchDarkly, Split.io” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · negative prompt · alternative
“Best if engineering is leading the initiative.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LaunchDarkly, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LaunchDarkly was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
VWO21 of 255Not among the top eight
Optimizely CMS21 of 254Not among the top eight
Adobe Target21 of 251Not among the top eight
Statsig18 of 253Not among the top eight
GrowthBook17 of 253Not among the top eight
Kameleoon15 of 252Not among the top eight
AB Tasty13 of 251Not among the top eight
Dynamic Yield9 of 250Not among the top eight
Convert Experiences8 of 252Not among the top eight
Split8 of 250Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LaunchDarkly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 25 answers that named LaunchDarkly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kameleoon.com15
growthbook.io13
statsig.com13
optimizely.com11
convert.com10
amplitude.com6
guideflow.com6
mida.so6
flagsmith.com5
learn.g2.com5

Ninety of the ninety domain citations in answers naming LaunchDarkly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

launchdarkly.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LaunchDarkly takes 0% of first choices and VWO takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “website experimentation and personalization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best website experimentation and personalization platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“launchdarkly”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
410 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 40,192 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,856 · 503 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,846
Paid Google search
6 searches its ads show for, about 66 clicks and $66 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
98 ads · 53 text, 28 image, 17 video · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2022, as CATAMORPHIC CO., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 56 in the year, 42 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 71 in experimentation
Segment leader
27%
VWO
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
25 answers
Its own site cited
in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on launchdarkly.com
3,013
subdomains included
Content
1,417
counted in the table below
Documentation
993
Product · Integration
30 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog938262026-09-23Product analytics
Report or ebook22302018-09-11Mobile apps
Webinar or virtual event7402023-07-27
Conference or event6602025-06-04
Case study4902016-05-19
Comparison2702026-05-30
Glossary or explainer1802024-08-07
Podcast or video1712026-08-06
Template or tool402024-12-06
News or press1undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on launchdarkly.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page launchdarkly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow LaunchDarkly

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

launchdarkly-server-sdk is the company behind LaunchDarkly.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
United States, United States
Founded
2014

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The runtime control layer for AI development, de-risking releases, and enabling systems that heal and optimize themselves.
For
AI engineers, developers, DevOps & SRE, product managers, data scientists
Price stated
Pricing launchdarkly.com
Starting price
0 launchdarkly.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free trial launchdarkly.com
Certifications
SOC2ISOHIPAASOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FedRAMP authorizedDPF
Hosting
EU Region Available
Customers named
Savage X FentyPokaDiorParamountHireologyAllyAlayaCareRelay Network
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What LaunchDarkly's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: launchdarkly.com, launchdarkly.com/pricing, launchdarkly.com/security, launchdarkly.com/solutions, launchdarkly.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LaunchDarkly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LaunchDarkly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LaunchDarkly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LaunchDarkly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LaunchDarkly, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at launchdarkly.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.