Every category where a model named LaunchDarkly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	0%	20 of 69	10%	10	accepted challenger
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	107 of 158	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LaunchDarkly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LaunchDarkly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative19 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Statsig / LaunchDarkly ... Best For: Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and product-led growth (PLG) teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Experimentation · comparative prompt · alternative

“Feature flag-centric with built-in experiments; excels in engineering-led rollouts” Grok 4.1 Fast · Experimentation · comparative prompt · alternative

“becomes the most expensive option at high MAU” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“LaunchDarkly is US-based and subject to CLOUD Act compelled disclosure” Mistral Small · Experimentation · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LaunchDarkly, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LaunchDarkly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Optimizely CMS33 of 3815Not in the top three

VWO33 of 385Not in the top three

Adobe Target33 of 383Not in the top three

Statsig24 of 381Not in the top three

AB Tasty24 of 380Not in the top three

Kameleoon23 of 382Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield23 of 381Not in the top three

GrowthBook21 of 381Not in the top three

Convert12 of 382Not in the top three

Eppo12 of 380Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LaunchDarkly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 38 answers that named LaunchDarkly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

growthbook.io7

vwo.com6

kameleoon.com5

statsig.com5

abtesting.cc3

amplitude.com3

convert.com3

gitnux.org3

davidleemannheim.medium.com2

f6s.com2

Thirty-nine of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming LaunchDarkly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

vwo.com/blog/experimentation-platform-guide6

kameleoon.com/blog/best-ab-testing-tools5

statsig.com/comparison/best-experimentation-tools5

statsig.com/comparison/best-experimentation-tools-developers5

growthbook.io/insights/best-ai-experimentation-platforms4

statsig.com/comparison/best-experimentation-tools-marketers4

abtesting.cc/blog/best-experimentation-platforms3

amplitude.com/compare/best-product-experimentation-tools-for-startups3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

launchdarkly-server-sdk is the company behind LaunchDarkly.

Website: launchdarkly.com
Headquarters: United States, United States
Founded: 2014

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LaunchDarkly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LaunchDarkly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at launchdarkly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.