| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 17 of 159 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 7 of 71 | 29% | 41 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 2% | 22 of 113 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 13% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Audio and podcast advertising | Marketing | 0% | 63 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by AudioGo at 34% | |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 55 of 60 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Email signature management | Marketing | 0% | 46 of 48 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Exclaimer at 33% | |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 101 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 74 of 130 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | 5% | 2% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 7 of 71 |
| DMP | 0% | 3% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 86 → 17 of 159 |
| Paid ads | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 98 → 22 of 113 |
| Audio advertising | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 101, unchanged |
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 60, unchanged |
| Email signatures | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 46 of 48, unchanged |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 101 of 111, unchanged |
| Proximity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 77 → 74 of 130 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies starting today, RollWorks or Terminus offer the best balance of capability, ease of use, and cost” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · direct prompt · first choice
“e.g., demandbase, Terminus, 6sense, or Rollworks depending on whether you prefer paid social or display ads” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ABM · scale prompt · first choice
“Terminus is the strongest mid-market choice currently on the market.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DMP · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top safer bets overall: RollWorks, Terminus, or Mutiny” Grok 4.1 Fast · ABM · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Terminus was acquired by DemandScience in November 2024, so it's no longer a standalone option.” Kimi K2 · ABM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“merged into DemandScience in November 2024 and is no longer an independent product or brand” Kimi K2 · ABM · comparative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise platforms like Demandbase, 6sense, or Terminus.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ABM · budget prompt · hard negative
“merged into DemandScience, so it no longer exists as an independent ABM solution” Mistral Small · ABM · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 135 of the 146 answers that named Terminus and are not a share of its labels.
491 of the 491 domain citations in answers naming Terminus came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 469 | 26 | 2026-09-10 | ABM, CRM | |
| Conference or event | 86 | 0 | 2023-06-13 | ||
| News or press | 82 | 6 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Comparison | 34 | 19 | 2026-09-11 | ABM | |
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2026-03-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | ABM | |
| Template or tool | 9 | 1 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2025-10-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-20 |
Every page demandscience.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Terminus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Terminus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Terminus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: