GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Foundry ABM · September 2026 Edition
Foundry · 1 category · Ranked

Foundry ABM

20Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in ABM for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 76 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Foundry ABM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%24 of 760%6under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Foundry ABM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Foundry ABM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Foundry ABM, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Foundry ABM was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AdRoll ABM19 of 206Not in the top three
6sense18 of 205Not in the top three
Demandbase18 of 205Not in the top three
Terminus12 of 201Not in the top three
Madison Logic11 of 200Not in the top three
HubSpot ABM9 of 202Not in the top three
ZenABM9 of 202Not in the top three
Influ28 of 200Not in the top three
Mutiny7 of 200Not in the top three
ZoomInfo5 of 200Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Foundry ABM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 20 answers that named Foundry ABM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

6sense.com1
demandbase.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Foundry ABM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Foundry ABM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Foundry ABM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Triblio 2Foundry ABM (formerly Triblio) 1

The company

The Foundry Visionmongers is the company behind Foundry ABM.
Website
foundry.com
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Founded
1996

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Foundry ABM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Foundry ABM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at foundry.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack