Every category where a model named Madison Logic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	27 of 76	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
B2B intent data providers	Sales	0%	50 of 62	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35%
Native and content advertising	Marketing	0%	34 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Madison Logic yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Madison Logic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative19 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“execute native ads programmatically via a B2B DSP like AdLib or Madison Logic” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Native ads · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Madison Logic and similar high-base-cost platforms unless you're mid-market or above” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ABM · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Madison Logic, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Madison Logic was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

6sense35 of 3718Not in the top three

Demandbase34 of 3718Not in the top three

AdRoll ABM29 of 371Not in the top three

Terminus22 of 371Not in the top three

ZoomInfo13 of 371Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Marketing13 of 370Not in the top three

Influ212 of 370Not in the top three

Foundry ABM11 of 371Not in the top three

Bombora10 of 371Not in the top three

Mutiny9 of 370Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Madison Logic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 37 answers that named Madison Logic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

demandbase.com4

6sense.com3

g2.com2

gartner.com2

abmatic.ai1

adroll.com1

bombora.com1

cleverly.co1

factors.ai1

geisheker.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Madison Logic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

6sense.com/blog/best-account-based-marketing-platforms2

6sense.com/platform/account-based-marketing2

gartner.com/reviews/market/account-based-marketing-platforms2

6sense.com/platform/intent-data1

abmatic.ai/blog/best-account-based-marketing-tools-20261

adroll.com/blog/best-abm-platforms-comparison1

bombora.com/intent1

cleverly.co/blog/account-based-marketing-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Madison Logic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Madison Logic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at madisonlogic.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.