Every category where a model named StackAdapt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Programmatic and display advertising	Marketing	61%	1 of 96	7%	54	endorsed leader
Video advertising	Marketing	24%	1 of 121	3%	31	accepted challenger
Native and content advertising	Marketing	23%	1 of 72	5%	40	accepted challenger
Retail, proximity and IoT marketing	Marketing	2%	23 of 131	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	30 of 183	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	2%	19 of 137	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	75 of 76	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	90 of 108	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Video marketing and hosting	Marketing	0%	29 of 56	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for StackAdapt yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated StackAdapt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	3	3	1	0	7
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	1	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	6	3	1	0	10
Perplexity Sonar	6	3	1	1	11
Grok 4.1 Fast	6	5	1	2	14
Mistral Small	5	4	4	0	13
DeepSeek V4 Flash	7	7	2	2	18
Llama 4 Maverick	3	1	6	0	10
Qwen 3.7 Flash	3	3	3	0	9
Kimi K2	6	6	0	0	12
GLM 4.7 FlashX	4	5	0	1	10
MiniMax M2.5	6	6	2	2	16

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct71 labels34

Paraphrase63 labels30

Comparative89 labels12not counted in share

Budget-constrained39 labels10

Scale-constrained35 labels14

Negative30 labels9not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative327 labels in all, every segment counted; 88 of the 109 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“StackAdapt appears frequently as a top recommendation for mid-market B2B companies specifically due to its balance of features and accessibility.” MiniMax M2.5 · Paid ads · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd choose StackAdapt for most companies with a limited budget because it is the most consistently recommended *low-to-mid budget* platform” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice

“Highly regarded for its intuitive UI, excellent customer support, absence of heavy minimum spends, and robust AI-driven optimizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Programmatic · scale prompt · first choice

“StackAdapt is a standout here. It requires no ad-ops specialist... For B2B / ABM campaigns: Start with StackAdapt.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Programmatic · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why avoid: If CTV represents over 40% of planned spend, these platforms should be eliminated” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Programmatic · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Taboola, Outbrain (now Teads), StackAdapt, and other premium platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Native ads · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid platforms like StackAdapt (~$2,500+/month) initially” MiniMax M2.5 · Native ads · budget prompt · hard negative

“StackAdapt if CTV is a major share of your budget, you need access to major walled gardens” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as StackAdapt, over the 327 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and StackAdapt was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

The Trade Desk179 of 32741Compare →

Teads109 of 32711Compare →

Taboola98 of 32718Not in the top three

Amazon DSP98 of 3273Not in the top three

Google Display & Video 36087 of 32718Not in the top three

MGID76 of 32716Compare →

Revcontent71 of 32712Not in the top three

Demandbase70 of 32713Not in the top three

Nativo57 of 3271Not in the top three

LinkedIn Campaign Manager56 of 3279Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named StackAdapt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 327 answers that named StackAdapt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vibe.co27

improvado.io22

aidigital.com20

getadlib.com18

demandbase.com17

guideflow.com16

6sense.com15

business.quora.com15

heysid.com15

syntermedia.ai15

180 of the 180 domain citations in answers naming StackAdapt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

improvado.io/blog/top-programmatic-platforms16

demandbase.com/blog/best-ctv-advertising-platforms13

taqtics.com/answers/programmatic-advertising/programmatic-advertising-platforms13

vibe.co/blog/how-to/programmatic-advertising-platforms13

6sense.com/blog/best-b2b-programmatic-advertising-platforms12

vibe.co/blog/how-to/video-advertising-platforms12

pipeline.zoominfo.com/marketing/b2b-advertising-platforms11

aidigital.com/blog/native-advertising-platforms10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as StackAdapt

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as StackAdapt; a claim can dispute any of them.

The Trade Desk/StackAdapt 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when StackAdapt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as StackAdapt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at stackadapt.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.